ScientificNameID not found definition isn't clear

[ManonGros]

Feedback on Occurrence issues and flags (Github source for this page)

Currently we only use WORMS (as far as I know) as reference to match values for scientific Name IDs. However it isn't mentioned in the definition of the flag. Publishers are led to believe that the identifiers they shared are invalid when they are just not supported by our system. Would it be possible to reformulate the definition? thanks!

[CecSve]

Currently, the definition is:

Flag: Scientific name ID not found
Description: The scientificNameID matched a known pattern, but it was not found in the associated checklist. The backbone lookup was performed using either the names or a different ID field from the record. This may indicate a poorly formatted identifier or may be caused by a newly created ID that isn't yet known in the version of the published checklist.

Would this work instead?:

Flag: Scientific name ID not found
Description: The scientificNameID matched a known pattern, but it was not found in a GBIF-supported checklist. The backbone lookup was performed using either the names or a different ID field from the record. This may indicate a poorly formatted identifier or may be caused by a newly created ID that isn't yet known in the version of the GBIF-supported and published checklist.

This way, it is generic enough to allow additional supported checklists eventually, and does not require manual update of the definition.

[ManonGros]

Thanks @CecSve !

Maybe we could be even more explicit, would it make sense to have the following instead?

"the reference checklists supported by GBIF" and then a link to somewhere (GitHub?) where the lists are detailed?

[CecSve]

This will support linking to a list of recognised scientificNameID providers.