tree-optimization/94864 - vector insert of vector extract simplification

The PRs ask for optimizing of

  _1 = BIT_FIELD_REF <b_3(D), 64, 64>;
  result_4 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <a_2(D), _1, 64>;

to a vector permutation.  The following implements this as
match.pd pattern, improving code generation on x86_64.

On the RTL level we face the issue that backend patterns inconsistently
use vec_merge and vec_select of vec_concat to represent permutes.

I think using a (supported) permute is almost always better
than an extract plus insert, maybe excluding the case we extract
element zero and that's aliased to a register that can be used
directly for insertion (not sure how to query that).

The patch FAILs one case in gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-vmovsh-1a.c
where we now expand from

 __A_28 = VEC_PERM_EXPR <x2.8_9, x1.9_10, { 0, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 }>;

instead of

 _28 = BIT_FIELD_REF <x2.8_9, 16, 0>;
 __A_29 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <x1.9_10, _28, 0>;

producing a vpblendw instruction instead of the expected vmovsh.  That's
either a missed vec_perm_const expansion optimization or even better,
an improvement - Zen4 for example has 4 ports to execute vpblendw
but only 3 for executing vmovsh and both instructions have the same size.

The patch XFAILs the sub-testcase.

	PR tree-optimization/94864
	PR tree-optimization/94865
	PR tree-optimization/93080
	* match.pd (bit_insert @0 (BIT_FIELD_REF @1 ..) ..): New pattern
	for vector insertion from vector extraction.

	* gcc.target/i386/pr94864.c: New testcase.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr94865.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-vmovsh-1a.c: XFAIL.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-40.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-41.c: Likewise.

Author: rguenth

gcc/match.pd

@@ -8006,6 +8006,31 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
 		      wi::to_wide (@ipos) + isize))
     (BIT_FIELD_REF @0 @rsize @rpos)))))
 
+/* Simplify vector inserts of other vector extracts to a permute.  */
+(simplify
+ (bit_insert @0 (BIT_FIELD_REF@2 @1 @rsize @rpos) @ipos)
+ (if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (type)
+      && types_match (@0, @1)
+      && types_match (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (@0)), TREE_TYPE (@2))
+      && TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).is_constant ())
+  (with
+   {
+     unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT elsz
+       = tree_to_uhwi (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (@1))));
+     poly_uint64 relt = exact_div (tree_to_poly_uint64 (@rpos), elsz);
+     poly_uint64 ielt = exact_div (tree_to_poly_uint64 (@ipos), elsz);
+     unsigned nunits = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
+     vec_perm_builder builder;
+     builder.new_vector (nunits, nunits, 1);
+     for (unsigned i = 0; i < nunits; ++i)
+       builder.quick_push (known_eq (ielt, i) ? nunits + relt : i);
+     vec_perm_indices sel (builder, 2, nunits);
+   }
+   (if (!VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (type))
+	|| can_vec_perm_const_p (TYPE_MODE (type), TYPE_MODE (type), sel, false))
+    (vec_perm @0 @1 { vec_perm_indices_to_tree
+                        (build_vector_type (ssizetype, nunits), sel); })))))
+
 (if (canonicalize_math_after_vectorization_p ())
  (for fmas (FMA)
   (simplify

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-40.c

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized -Wno-psabi -w" } */
+
+#define vector __attribute__((__vector_size__(16) ))
+
+vector int g(vector int a)
+{
+  int b = a[0];
+  a[0] = b;
+  return a;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "BIT_INSERT_EXPR" 0 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "BIT_FIELD_REF" 0 "optimized" } } */

gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-41.c

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized -Wno-psabi -w" } */
+
+#define vector __attribute__((__vector_size__(16) ))
+
+vector int g(vector int a, int c)
+{
+  int b = a[2];
+  a[2] = b;
+  a[1] = c;
+  return a;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "BIT_INSERT_EXPR" 1 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "BIT_FIELD_REF" 0 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "VEC_PERM_EXPR" 0 "optimized" } } */

gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-vmovsh-1a.c

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovsh\[ \\t\]+%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r\]*%\[er\]\[ad]x+\[^\n\r]*\{%k\[0-9\]\}(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovsh\[ \\t\]+\[^\n\r\]*%\[er\]\[ad]x+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\{%k\[0-9\]\}(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovsh\[ \\t\]+\[^\n\r\]*%\[er\]\[ad]x+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\{%k\[0-9\]\}\{z\}\[^\n\r]*(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovsh\[ \\t\]+%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovsh\[ \\t\]+%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 { xfail *-*-* } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovsh\[ \\t\]+%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\{%k\[0-9\]\}\[^z\n\r]*(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmovsh\[ \\t\]+%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\[^\n\r]*%xmm\[0-9\]+\{%k\[0-9\]\}\{z\}\[^\n\r]*(?:\n|\[ \\t\]+#)" 1 } } */
 

gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94864.c

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -msse2 -mno-avx" } */
+
+typedef double v2df __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
+
+v2df move_sd(v2df a, v2df b)
+{
+    v2df result = a;
+    result[0] = b[1];
+    return result;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "unpckhpd\[\\t \]%xmm0, %xmm1" } } */

gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr94865.c

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -msse2 -mno-avx" } */
+
+typedef double v2df __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
+
+v2df move_sd(v2df a, v2df b)
+{
+    v2df result = a;
+    result[1] = b[1];
+    return result;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "shufpd\[\\t \]*.2, %xmm1, %xmm0" } } */