-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 484
Open
Description
What's your opinion on group testing? Here's a math analysis on it:
| Infection rate ► Initial mini-pool size ▼ | 0.5% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 5% | 8% | 10% | 20% | 50% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 1.12 |
| 4 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 1.30 |
| 8 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.82 | 1.41 |
| 16 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.87 | 1.47 |
| 32 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.90 | 1.51 |
My concerns are:
- RT-PCR has 60-80% sensitivity which would ruin the predictive value of a branch (as you go up the tree the test outcome affects the final result bits exponentially).
- Is the lack of sensitivity due to (individual vs mixed sensitivity):
a. virus RNA doesn't stay in everyone's throat
b. failure in extraction/probing - Can you reliably keep split one patient's sample into N parts where N is the testing tree height? (since
max SampleCnt(Patient_i) = N)
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels