Question - binaries source

[Gaetanbrl]

Starting from a master version adapted for 25.0.x, I have an issue with MapStore (see issue #150).

As a result, the Ansible playbook uses package.georchestra.org.

Elsewhere, there is an action in the mapstore2-georchestra repository that builds for Artifactory and Debian packages:

https://github.com/georchestra/mapstore2-georchestra/actions/runs/19824796738/workflow#L60-L86

This may be a naive question, but why do we have more than one source ?

I’m thinking that it may be due to multiple ways of installing or maintaining geOrchestra.

[landryb]

personally, i dont trust github, nor github actions. They dont keep artifacts for a long time.

having a distinct CI allows one to ensure the code stays buildable, following more or less the documented steps in the READMEs, outside of the magic done by GH.