Feature Description
Problem: Currently, the only deployment method is via Docker Compose or CLI. This adds complexity for users on NAS (like Synology), or platforms that prefer single-container deployments (like Render, Heroku, or certain VPS setups).
Proposal: Could you provide a single "All-in-One" Docker image that bundles the frontend, backend, and a lightweight database (or allows an external one via env vars)?
Benefit: This would significantly lower the barrier for new users to try out Arcane with a simple docker run command.
Thanks for the great work!
Problem It Solves
Problem: Currently, the only deployment method is via Docker Compose or CLI. This adds complexity for users on NAS (like Synology), or platforms that prefer single-container deployments (like Render, Heroku, or certain VPS setups).
Proposal: Could you provide a single "All-in-One" Docker image that bundles the frontend, backend, and a lightweight database (or allows an external one via env vars)?
Benefit: This would significantly lower the barrier for new users to try out Arcane with a simple docker run command.
Thanks for the great work!
Proposed Solution
Problem: Currently, the only deployment method is via Docker Compose or CLI. This adds complexity for users on NAS (like Synology), or platforms that prefer single-container deployments (like Render, Heroku, or certain VPS setups).
Proposal: Could you provide a single "All-in-One" Docker image that bundles the frontend, backend, and a lightweight database (or allows an external one via env vars)?
Benefit: This would significantly lower the barrier for new users to try out Arcane with a simple docker run command.
Thanks for the great work!
Alternatives Considered
No response
Additional Context
No response
Would you be willing to work on this feature?
Feature Description
Problem: Currently, the only deployment method is via Docker Compose or CLI. This adds complexity for users on NAS (like Synology), or platforms that prefer single-container deployments (like Render, Heroku, or certain VPS setups).
Proposal: Could you provide a single "All-in-One" Docker image that bundles the frontend, backend, and a lightweight database (or allows an external one via env vars)?
Benefit: This would significantly lower the barrier for new users to try out Arcane with a simple docker run command.
Thanks for the great work!
Problem It Solves
Problem: Currently, the only deployment method is via Docker Compose or CLI. This adds complexity for users on NAS (like Synology), or platforms that prefer single-container deployments (like Render, Heroku, or certain VPS setups).
Proposal: Could you provide a single "All-in-One" Docker image that bundles the frontend, backend, and a lightweight database (or allows an external one via env vars)?
Benefit: This would significantly lower the barrier for new users to try out Arcane with a simple docker run command.
Thanks for the great work!
Proposed Solution
Problem: Currently, the only deployment method is via Docker Compose or CLI. This adds complexity for users on NAS (like Synology), or platforms that prefer single-container deployments (like Render, Heroku, or certain VPS setups).
Proposal: Could you provide a single "All-in-One" Docker image that bundles the frontend, backend, and a lightweight database (or allows an external one via env vars)?
Benefit: This would significantly lower the barrier for new users to try out Arcane with a simple docker run command.
Thanks for the great work!
Alternatives Considered
No response
Additional Context
No response
Would you be willing to work on this feature?