this & Object Prototypes: 2: function reference property #1444
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Proposal to rephrase “property function reference” to “function reference property” which more clearly communicates a function reference stored as a property.
|
Thanks for the suggestion! |
|
👍🏾 you’re welcome. Thanks for all the knowledge in this excellent book. |
getify
force-pushed
the
master
branch
6 times, most recently
from
5cb284a to
8af48e2
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposal to rephrase “property function reference” to “function reference property” which more clearly communicates a function reference stored as a property.
The original phrasing can be confusing when read as “property function reference” vs. “function reference property”.
Yes, I promise I've read the Contributions Guidelines.