-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
feat(node): Implement Sentry-specific http instrumentation #13763
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-otel-without-tracing/src/instrument.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
size-limit report 📦
|
❌ 1 Tests Failed:
View the top 1 failed tests by shortest run time
To view individual test run time comparison to the main branch, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard |
) Found this while working on #13763. Oops, the node-otel-without-tracing E2E test was not running on CI, we forgot to add it there - and it was actually failing since we switched to the new undici instrumentation :O This PR ensures to add it to CI, and also fixes it. The main change for this is to ensure we do not emit any spans when tracing is disabled, while still ensuring that trace propagation works as expected for this case. I also pulled some general changes into this, which ensure that we patch both `http.get` and `http.request` properly.
8cb19ad to
a9fde4f
Compare
|
v1.11.1 of |
b7c8b37 to
00d177d
Compare
| "devDependencies": { | ||
| "@sentry-internal/test-utils": "link:../../../test-utils", | ||
| "@playwright/test": "^1.44.1", | ||
| "wait-port": "1.0.4" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cleaned this up as this is not needed anymore
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| child_process.execSync('pnpm start', { | ||
| stdio: 'ignore', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
was debugging a test here for some time, this made it much easier to debug this
Lms24
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine to me! I like the idea of having request isolation/our behaviour we add in addition to spans separated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm trying to work out what Node version diagnostics_channel http events were added because they probably make this all possible without touching otel/import-in-the-middle. It has both start and end events for both incoming and outgoing requests.
UPDATE
Yep, just tested and these events are available in v14.17.0
|
Let me know if you want me to have a try at reworking this PR with |
|
Thanks for that Tim, I was not aware this was available for Node 14+! I will give it a quick look to see if I can easily use this instead in this PR, if so I'll update it right away. If it is more complex, maybe we merge this and then update it in a follow up :) |
6bf01c5 to
d0aac35
Compare
|
So for reference, it is not that easy to move this to diagnostics channel, because there we cannot wrap the incoming request in an easy way to ensure async local storage has the correct isolation scope etc. So I'm going to merge this like this, we can investigate in a follow up if we can refactor it! |
| ...options, | ||
| _instrumentation: RemixHttpIntegration, | ||
| // We disable incoming request spans here, because otherwise we'd end up with duplicate spans. | ||
| disableIncomingRequestSpans: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @lforst also relevant for Next after we merge this
I assume this is due to #13763
This PR is a pretty big change, but it should help us to make custom
OTEL support way better/easier to understand in the future.
The fundamental problem this PR is trying to change is the restriction
that we rely on our instance of `HttpInstrumentation` for
Sentry-specific (read: not span-related) things. This made it
tricky/annoying for users with a custom OTEL setup that may include
`HttpInstrumentation` to get things working, because they may
inadvertedly overwrite our instance of the instrumentation (because
there can only be a single monkey-patch per module in the regular
instrumentations), leading to hard-to-debug and often subtle problems.
This PR fixes this by splitting out the non-span related http
instrumentation code into a new, dedicated `SentryHttpInstrumentation`,
which can be run side-by-side with the OTEL instrumentation (which emits
spans, ...).
We make this work by basically implementing our own custom, minimal
`wrap` method instead of using shimmer. This way, OTEL instrumentation
cannot identify the wrapped module as wrapped, and allow to wrap it
again. While this is _slightly_ hacky and also means you cannot unwrap
the http module, we do not generally support this for the Sentry SDK
anyhow.
This new Instrumentation does two things:
1. Handles automatic forking of the isolation scope per incoming
request. By using our own code, we can actually make this much nicer, as
we do not need to retrospectively update the isolation scope anymore,
but instead we can do this properly now.
2. Emit breadcrumbs for outgoing requests.
With this change, in errors only mode you really do not need our
instance of the default `HttpInstrumentation` anymore at all, you
can/should just provide your own if you want to capture http spans in a
non-Sentry environment. However, this is sadly a bit tricky, because up
to now we forced users in this scenario to still use our Http instance
and avoid adding their own (instead we allowed users to pass their Http
instrumentation config to our Http integration). This means that if we'd
simply stop adding our http instrumentation instance when tracing is
disabled, these users would stop getting otel spans as well :/ so we
sadly can't change this without a major.
Instead, I re-introduced the `spans: false` for `httpIntegration({
spans: false })`. When this is set (which for now is opt-in, but
probably should be opt-out in v9) we will only register
SentryHttpInstrumentation, not HttpInstrumentation, thus not emitting
any spans. Users can add their own instance of HttpInstrumentation if
they care.
One semi-related thing that I noticed while looking into this is that we
incorrectly emitted node-fetch spans in errors-only mode. This
apparently sneaked in when we migrated to the new undici
instrumentation. I extracted this out into a dedicated PR too, but the
changes are in this too because tests were a bit fucked up otherwise.
On top of #13765
This also includes a bump of import-in-the-middle to 1.11.2, as this
includes a fix to properly allow double-wrapping ESM modules.
This PR is a pretty big change, but it should help us to make custom OTEL support way better/easier to understand in the future.
The fundamental problem this PR is trying to change is the restriction that we rely on our instance of
HttpInstrumentationfor Sentry-specific (read: not span-related) things. This made it tricky/annoying for users with a custom OTEL setup that may includeHttpInstrumentationto get things working, because they may inadvertedly overwrite our instance of the instrumentation (because there can only be a single monkey-patch per module in the regular instrumentations), leading to hard-to-debug and often subtle problems.This PR fixes this by splitting out the non-span related http instrumentation code into a new, dedicated
SentryHttpInstrumentation, which can be run side-by-side with the OTEL instrumentation (which emits spans, ...).We make this work by basically implementing our own custom, minimal
wrapmethod instead of using shimmer. This way, OTEL instrumentation cannot identify the wrapped module as wrapped, and allow to wrap it again. While this is slightly hacky and also means you cannot unwrap the http module, we do not generally support this for the Sentry SDK anyhow.This new Instrumentation does two things:
With this change, in errors only mode you really do not need our instance of the default
HttpInstrumentationanymore at all, you can/should just provide your own if you want to capture http spans in a non-Sentry environment. However, this is sadly a bit tricky, because up to now we forced users in this scenario to still use our Http instance and avoid adding their own (instead we allowed users to pass their Http instrumentation config to our Http integration). This means that if we'd simply stop adding our http instrumentation instance when tracing is disabled, these users would stop getting otel spans as well :/ so we sadly can't change this without a major.Instead, I re-introduced the
spans: falseforhttpIntegration({ spans: false }). When this is set (which for now is opt-in, but probably should be opt-out in v9) we will only register SentryHttpInstrumentation, not HttpInstrumentation, thus not emitting any spans. Users can add their own instance of HttpInstrumentation if they care.One semi-related thing that I noticed while looking into this is that we incorrectly emitted node-fetch spans in errors-only mode. This apparently sneaked in when we migrated to the new undici instrumentation. I extracted this out into a dedicated PR too, but the changes are in this too because tests were a bit fucked up otherwise.
On top of #13765
This also includes a bump of import-in-the-middle to 1.11.2, as this includes a fix to properly allow double-wrapping ESM modules.