Commit 0f45b5b
committed
show-branch doc: say <ref>, not <reference>
The glossary defines 'ref' as the official name of the thing,
and the output from "git grep -e '<ref' Documentation/" shows
that most everybody uses <ref>, not <reference>. In addition,
the page already says <ref> in its SYNOPSIS section for the
command when it is used in the mode to follow the reflogs.
Strictly speaking, many references of these should be updated to
<commit> after adding an explanation on how these <commit>s are
discovered (i.e. we take <rev>, <glob>, or <ref> and starting from
these commits, follow their ancestry or reflog entries to list
commits), but that would be a lot bigger change I would rather not
to do in this patch, whose primary purpose is to make the existing
documentation more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>1 parent 00bf685 commit 0f45b5b
1 file changed
+8
-8
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
74 | 74 | | |
75 | 75 | | |
76 | 76 | | |
77 | | - | |
78 | | - | |
| 77 | + | |
79 | 78 | | |
80 | 79 | | |
81 | 80 | | |
| |||
88 | 87 | | |
89 | 88 | | |
90 | 89 | | |
91 | | - | |
92 | | - | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
93 | 92 | | |
94 | 93 | | |
95 | 94 | | |
| |||
132 | 131 | | |
133 | 132 | | |
134 | 133 | | |
135 | | - | |
136 | | - | |
137 | | - | |
138 | | - | |
| 134 | + | |
| 135 | + | |
| 136 | + | |
| 137 | + | |
| 138 | + | |
139 | 139 | | |
140 | 140 | | |
141 | 141 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments