@@ -157,9 +157,8 @@ already exists on the remote side.
157157 Usually, "git push" refuses to update a remote ref that is
158158 not an ancestor of the local ref used to overwrite it.
159159+
160- This option bypasses the check, but instead requires that the
161- current value of the ref to be the expected value. "git push"
162- fails otherwise.
160+ This option overrides this restriction if the current value of the
161+ remote ref is the expected value. "git push" fails otherwise.
163162+
164163Imagine that you have to rebase what you have already published.
165164You will have to bypass the "must fast-forward" rule in order to
@@ -171,15 +170,14 @@ commit, and blindly pushing with `--force` will lose her work.
171170This option allows you to say that you expect the history you are
172171updating is what you rebased and want to replace. If the remote ref
173172still points at the commit you specified, you can be sure that no
174- other people did anything to the ref (it is like taking a "lease" on
175- the ref without explicitly locking it, and you update the ref while
176- making sure that your earlier "lease" is still valid) .
173+ other people did anything to the ref. It is like taking a "lease" on
174+ the ref without explicitly locking it, and the remote ref is updated
175+ only if the "lease" is still valid.
177176+
178177`--force-with-lease` alone, without specifying the details, will protect
179178all remote refs that are going to be updated by requiring their
180179current value to be the same as the remote-tracking branch we have
181- for them, unless specified with a `--force-with-lease=<refname>:<expect>`
182- option that explicitly states what the expected value is.
180+ for them.
183181+
184182`--force-with-lease=<refname>`, without specifying the expected value, will
185183protect the named ref (alone), if it is going to be updated, by
0 commit comments