Skip to content

Commit 3127ff9

Browse files
dyronegitster
authored andcommitted
packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description
Fix the 'uploadpack.blobPackfileUri' description in packfile-uri.txt and the correct format also can be seen in t5702. Signed-off-by: Teng Long <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
1 parent 48bf2fa commit 3127ff9

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-7
lines changed

1 file changed

+8
-7
lines changed

Documentation/technical/packfile-uri.txt

Lines changed: 8 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -35,13 +35,14 @@ include some sort of non-trivial implementation in the Minimum Viable Product,
3535
at least so that we can test the client.
3636

3737
This is the implementation: a feature, marked experimental, that allows the
38-
server to be configured by one or more `uploadpack.blobPackfileUri=<sha1>
39-
<uri>` entries. Whenever the list of objects to be sent is assembled, all such
40-
blobs are excluded, replaced with URIs. As noted in "Future work" below, the
41-
server can evolve in the future to support excluding other objects (or other
42-
implementations of servers could be made that support excluding other objects)
43-
without needing a protocol change, so clients should not expect that packfiles
44-
downloaded in this way only contain single blobs.
38+
server to be configured by one or more `uploadpack.blobPackfileUri=
39+
<object-hash> <pack-hash> <uri>` entries. Whenever the list of objects to be
40+
sent is assembled, all such blobs are excluded, replaced with URIs. As noted
41+
in "Future work" below, the server can evolve in the future to support
42+
excluding other objects (or other implementations of servers could be made
43+
that support excluding other objects) without needing a protocol change, so
44+
clients should not expect that packfiles downloaded in this way only contain
45+
single blobs.
4546

4647
Client design
4748
-------------

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)