You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When fetching with the `--prune` flag we will delete any local
references matching the fetch refspec which have disappeared on the
remote. This step is not currently covered by the `--atomic` flag: we
delete branches even though updating of local references has failed,
which means that the fetch is not an all-or-nothing operation.
Fix this bug by passing in the global transaction into `prune_refs()`:
if one is given, then we'll only queue up deletions and not commit them
right away.
This change also improves performance when pruning many branches in a
repository with a big packed-refs file: every references is pruned in
its own transaction, which means that we potentially have to rewrite
the packed-refs files for every single reference we're about to prune.
The following benchmark demonstrates this: it performs a pruning fetch
from a repository with a single reference into a repository with 100k
references, which causes us to prune all but one reference. This is of
course a very artificial setup, but serves to demonstrate the impact of
only having to write the packed-refs file once:
Benchmark 1: git fetch --prune --atomic +refs/*:refs/* (HEAD~)
Time (mean ± σ): 2.366 s ± 0.021 s [User: 0.858 s, System: 1.508 s]
Range (min … max): 2.328 s … 2.407 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: git fetch --prune --atomic +refs/*:refs/* (HEAD)
Time (mean ± σ): 1.369 s ± 0.017 s [User: 0.715 s, System: 0.641 s]
Range (min … max): 1.346 s … 1.400 s 10 runs
Summary
'git fetch --prune --atomic +refs/*:refs/* (HEAD)' ran
1.73 ± 0.03 times faster than 'git fetch --prune --atomic +refs/*:refs/* (HEAD~)'
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
0 commit comments