|
| 1 | +#!/bin/sh |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +test_description='object name disambiguation |
| 4 | +
|
| 5 | +Create blobs, trees, commits and a tag that all share the same |
| 6 | +prefix, and make sure "git rev-parse" can take advantage of |
| 7 | +type information to disambiguate short object names that are |
| 8 | +not necessarily unique. |
| 9 | +
|
| 10 | +The final history used in the test has five commits, with the bottom |
| 11 | +one tagged as v1.0.0. They all have one regular file each. |
| 12 | +
|
| 13 | + +-------------------------------------------+ |
| 14 | + | | |
| 15 | + | .-------b3wettvi---- ad2uee | |
| 16 | + | / / | |
| 17 | + | a2onsxbvj---czy8f73t--ioiley5o | |
| 18 | + | | |
| 19 | + +-------------------------------------------+ |
| 20 | +
|
| 21 | +' |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +. ./test-lib.sh |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +test_expect_success 'blob and tree' ' |
| 26 | + test_tick && |
| 27 | + ( |
| 28 | + for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| 29 | + do |
| 30 | + echo $i |
| 31 | + done |
| 32 | + echo |
| 33 | + echo b1rwzyc3 |
| 34 | + ) >a0blgqsjc && |
| 35 | +
|
| 36 | + # create one blob 0000000000b36 |
| 37 | + git add a0blgqsjc && |
| 38 | +
|
| 39 | + # create one tree 0000000000cdc |
| 40 | + git write-tree |
| 41 | +' |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +test_expect_success 'warn ambiguity when no candidate matches type hint' ' |
| 44 | + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify 000000000^{commit} 2>actual && |
| 45 | + grep "short SHA1 000000000 is ambiguous" actual |
| 46 | +' |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +test_expect_failure 'disambiguate tree-ish' ' |
| 49 | + # feed tree-ish in an unambiguous way |
| 50 | + git rev-parse --verify 0000000000cdc:a0blgqsjc && |
| 51 | +
|
| 52 | + # ambiguous at the object name level, but there is only one |
| 53 | + # such tree-ish (the other is a blob) |
| 54 | + git rev-parse --verify 000000000:a0blgqsjc |
| 55 | +' |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +test_expect_failure 'disambiguate blob' ' |
| 58 | + sed -e "s/|$//" >patch <<-EOF && |
| 59 | + diff --git a/frotz b/frotz |
| 60 | + index 000000000..ffffff 100644 |
| 61 | + --- a/frotz |
| 62 | + +++ b/frotz |
| 63 | + @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ |
| 64 | + 9 |
| 65 | + | |
| 66 | + b1rwzyc3 |
| 67 | + +irwry |
| 68 | + EOF |
| 69 | + ( |
| 70 | + GIT_INDEX_FILE=frotz && |
| 71 | + export GIT_INDEX_FILE && |
| 72 | + git apply --build-fake-ancestor frotz patch && |
| 73 | + git cat-file blob :frotz >actual |
| 74 | + ) && |
| 75 | + test_cmp a0blgqsjc actual |
| 76 | +' |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +test_expect_failure 'disambiguate tree' ' |
| 79 | + commit=$(echo "d7xm" | git commit-tree 000000000) && |
| 80 | + test $(git rev-parse $commit^{tree}) = $(git rev-parse 0000000000cdc) |
| 81 | +' |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +test_expect_success 'first commit' ' |
| 84 | + # create one commit 0000000000e4f |
| 85 | + git commit -m a2onsxbvj |
| 86 | +' |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +test_expect_failure 'disambiguate commit-ish' ' |
| 89 | + # feed commit-ish in an unambiguous way |
| 90 | + git rev-parse --verify 0000000000e4f^{commit} && |
| 91 | +
|
| 92 | + # ambiguous at the object name level, but there is only one |
| 93 | + # such commit (the others are tree and blob) |
| 94 | + git rev-parse --verify 000000000^{commit} && |
| 95 | +
|
| 96 | + # likewise |
| 97 | + git rev-parse --verify 000000000^0 |
| 98 | +' |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +test_expect_failure 'disambiguate commit' ' |
| 101 | + commit=$(echo "j9xqh" | git commit-tree 0000000000cdc -p 000000000) && |
| 102 | + test $(git rev-parse $commit^) = $(git rev-parse 0000000000e4f) |
| 103 | +' |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +test_expect_failure 'log name1..name2 takes only commit-ishes on both ends' ' |
| 106 | + git log 000000000..000000000 && |
| 107 | + git log ..000000000 && |
| 108 | + git log 000000000.. && |
| 109 | + git log 000000000...000000000 && |
| 110 | + git log ...000000000 && |
| 111 | + git log 000000000... |
| 112 | +' |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +test_expect_failure 'rev-parse name1..name2 takes only commit-ishes on both ends' ' |
| 115 | + git rev-parse 000000000..000000000 && |
| 116 | + git rev-parse ..000000000 && |
| 117 | + git rev-parse 000000000.. |
| 118 | +' |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +test_expect_failure 'git log takes only commit-ish' ' |
| 121 | + git log 000000000 |
| 122 | +' |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +test_expect_failure 'git reset takes only commit-ish' ' |
| 125 | + git reset 000000000 |
| 126 | +' |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +test_expect_success 'first tag' ' |
| 129 | + # create one tag 0000000000f8f |
| 130 | + git tag -a -m j7cp83um v1.0.0 |
| 131 | +' |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +test_expect_failure 'two semi-ambiguous commit-ish' ' |
| 134 | + # Once the parser becomes ultra-smart, it could notice that |
| 135 | + # 110282 before ^{commit} name many different objects, but |
| 136 | + # that only two (HEAD and v1.0.0 tag) can be peeled to commit, |
| 137 | + # and that peeling them down to commit yield the same commit |
| 138 | + # without ambiguity. |
| 139 | + git rev-parse --verify 110282^{commit} && |
| 140 | +
|
| 141 | + # likewise |
| 142 | + git log 000000000..000000000 && |
| 143 | + git log ..000000000 && |
| 144 | + git log 000000000.. && |
| 145 | + git log 000000000...000000000 && |
| 146 | + git log ...000000000 && |
| 147 | + git log 000000000... |
| 148 | +' |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +test_expect_failure 'three semi-ambiguous tree-ish' ' |
| 151 | + # Likewise for tree-ish. HEAD, v1.0.0 and HEAD^{tree} share |
| 152 | + # the prefix but peeling them to tree yields the same thing |
| 153 | + git rev-parse --verify 000000000^{tree} |
| 154 | +' |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +test_expect_success 'parse describe name' ' |
| 157 | + # feed an unambiguous describe name |
| 158 | + git rev-parse --verify v1.0.0-0-g0000000000e4f && |
| 159 | +
|
| 160 | + # ambiguous at the object name level, but there is only one |
| 161 | + # such commit (others are blob, tree and tag) |
| 162 | + git rev-parse --verify v1.0.0-0-g000000000 |
| 163 | +' |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +test_expect_success 'more history' ' |
| 166 | + # commit 0000000000043 |
| 167 | + git mv a0blgqsjc d12cr3h8t && |
| 168 | + echo h62xsjeu >>d12cr3h8t && |
| 169 | + git add d12cr3h8t && |
| 170 | +
|
| 171 | + test_tick && |
| 172 | + git commit -m czy8f73t && |
| 173 | +
|
| 174 | + # commit 00000000008ec |
| 175 | + git mv d12cr3h8t j000jmpzn && |
| 176 | + echo j08bekfvt >>j000jmpzn && |
| 177 | + git add j000jmpzn && |
| 178 | +
|
| 179 | + test_tick && |
| 180 | + git commit -m ioiley5o && |
| 181 | +
|
| 182 | + # commit 0000000005b0 |
| 183 | + git checkout v1.0.0^0 && |
| 184 | + git mv a0blgqsjc f5518nwu && |
| 185 | +
|
| 186 | + for i in h62xsjeu j08bekfvt kg7xflhm |
| 187 | + do |
| 188 | + echo $i |
| 189 | + done >>f5518nwu && |
| 190 | + git add f5518nwu && |
| 191 | +
|
| 192 | + test_tick && |
| 193 | + git commit -m b3wettvi && |
| 194 | + side=$(git rev-parse HEAD) && |
| 195 | +
|
| 196 | + # commit 000000000066 |
| 197 | + git checkout master && |
| 198 | +
|
| 199 | + # If you use recursive, merge will fail and you will need to |
| 200 | + # clean up a0blgqsjc as well. If you use resolve, merge will |
| 201 | + # succeed. |
| 202 | + test_might_fail git merge --no-commit -s recursive $side && |
| 203 | + git rm -f f5518nwu j000jmpzn && |
| 204 | +
|
| 205 | + test_might_fail git rm -f a0blgqsjc && |
| 206 | + ( |
| 207 | + git cat-file blob $side:f5518nwu |
| 208 | + echo j3l0i9s6 |
| 209 | + ) >ab2gs879 && |
| 210 | + git add ab2gs879 && |
| 211 | +
|
| 212 | + test_tick && |
| 213 | + git commit -m ad2uee |
| 214 | +
|
| 215 | +' |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +test_expect_failure 'parse describe name taking advantage of generation' ' |
| 218 | + # ambiguous at the object name level, but there is only one |
| 219 | + # such commit at generation 0 |
| 220 | + git rev-parse --verify v1.0.0-0-g000000000 && |
| 221 | +
|
| 222 | + # likewise for generation 2 and 4 |
| 223 | + git rev-parse --verify v1.0.0-2-g000000000 && |
| 224 | + git rev-parse --verify v1.0.0-4-g000000000 |
| 225 | +' |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +# Note: because rev-parse does not even try to disambiguate based on |
| 228 | +# the generation number, this test currently succeeds for a wrong |
| 229 | +# reason. When it learns to use the generation number, the previous |
| 230 | +# test should succeed, and also this test should fail because the |
| 231 | +# describe name used in the test with generation number can name two |
| 232 | +# commits. Make sure that such a future enhancement does not randomly |
| 233 | +# pick one. |
| 234 | +test_expect_success 'parse describe name not ignoring ambiguity' ' |
| 235 | + # ambiguous at the object name level, and there are two such |
| 236 | + # commits at generation 1 |
| 237 | + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify v1.0.0-1-g000000000 |
| 238 | +' |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | +test_expect_success 'ambiguous commit-ish' ' |
| 241 | + # Now there are many commits that begin with the |
| 242 | + # common prefix, none of these should pick one at |
| 243 | + # random. They all should result in ambiguity errors. |
| 244 | + test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify 110282^{commit} && |
| 245 | +
|
| 246 | + # likewise |
| 247 | + test_must_fail git log 000000000..000000000 && |
| 248 | + test_must_fail git log ..000000000 && |
| 249 | + test_must_fail git log 000000000.. && |
| 250 | + test_must_fail git log 000000000...000000000 && |
| 251 | + test_must_fail git log ...000000000 && |
| 252 | + test_must_fail git log 000000000... |
| 253 | +' |
| 254 | + |
| 255 | +test_done |
0 commit comments