You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
commit-graph: fix ordering bug in generation numbers
When computing the generation numbers for a commit-graph, we compute
the corrected commit dates and then check if their offsets from the
actual dates is too large to fit in the 32-bit Generation Data chunk.
However, there is a problem with this approach: if we have parsed the
generation data from the previous commit-graph, then we continue the
loop because the corrected commit date is already computed. This causes
an under-count in the number of overflow values.
It is incorrect to add an increment to num_generation_data_overflows
next to this 'continue' statement, because we might start
double-counting commits that are computed because of the depth-first
search walk from a commit with an earlier OID.
Instead, iterate over the full commit list at the end, checking the
offsets to see how many grow beyond the maximum value.
Create a new t5328-commit-graph-64-bit-time.sh test script to handle
special cases of testing 64-bit timestamps. This helps demonstrate this
bug in more cases. It still won't hit all potential cases until the next
change, which reenables reading generation numbers. Use the skip_all
trick from 0a2bfcc (t0051: use "skip_all" under !MINGW in
single-test file, 2022-02-04) to make the output clean when run on a
32-bit system.
Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
0 commit comments