You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we scan a pack directory to load the idx entries we find into the
packed_git list, we skip any of them that are contained in a midx. We
then load them later lazily if we actually need to access the
corresponding pack, referencing them both from the midx struct and the
packed_git list.
The lazy-load in the midx code checks to see if the midx already
mentions the pack, but doesn't otherwise check the packed_git list. This
makes sense, since we should have added any pack to both lists.
But there's a loophole! If we call close_object_store(), that frees the
midx entirely, but _not_ the packed_git structs, which we must keep
around for Reasons[1]. If we then try to look up more objects, we'll
auto-load the midx again, which won't realize that we've already loaded
those packs, and will create duplicate entries in the packed_git list.
This is possibly inefficient, because it means we may open and map the
pack redundantly. But it can also lead to weird user-visible behavior.
The case I found is in "git repack", which closes and reopens the midx
after repacking and then calls update_server_info(). We end up writing
the duplicate entries into objects/info/packs.
We could obviously de-dup them while writing that file, but it seems
like a violation of more core assumptions that we end up with these
duplicate structs at all.
We can avoid the duplicates reasonably efficiently by checking their
names in the pack_map hash. This annoyingly does require a little more
than a straight hash lookup due to the naming conventions, but it should
only happen when we are about to actually open a pack. I don't think one
extra malloc will be noticeable there.
[1] I'm not entirely sure of all the details, except that we generally
assume the packed_git structs never go away. We noted this
restriction in the comment added by 6f1e939 (object: fix leaking
packfiles when closing object store, 2024-08-08), but it's somewhat
vague. At any rate, if you try freeing the structs in
close_object_store(), you can observe segfaults all over the test
suite. So it might be fixable, but it's not trivial.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <[email protected]>
0 commit comments