Skip to content

Commit e0c08a4

Browse files
peffgitster
authored andcommitted
git-compat-util: avoid redefining system function names
Our git-compat-util header defines a few noop wrappers for system functions if they are not available. This was originally done with a macro, but in 15b52a4 (compat-util: type-check parameters of no-op replacement functions, 2020-08-06) we switched to inline functions, because it gives us basic type-checking. This can cause compilation failures when the system _does_ declare those functions but we choose not to use them, since the compiler will complain about the redeclaration. This was seen in the real world when compiling against certain builds of uclibc, which may leave _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS unset, but still declare flockfile() and funlockfile(). It can also be seen on any platform that has setitimer() if you choose to compile without it (which plausibly could happen if the system implementation is buggy). E.g., on Linux: $ make NO_SETITIMER=IWouldPreferNotTo git.o CC git.o In file included from builtin.h:4, from git.c:1: git-compat-util.h:344:19: error: conflicting types for ‘setitimer’; have ‘int(int, const struct itimerval *, struct itimerval *)’ 344 | static inline int setitimer(int which UNUSED, | ^~~~~~~~~ In file included from git-compat-util.h:234: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/time.h:155:12: note: previous declaration of ‘setitimer’ with type ‘int(__itimer_which_t, const struct itimerval * restrict, struct itimerval * restrict)’ 155 | extern int setitimer (__itimer_which_t __which, | ^~~~~~~~~ make: *** [Makefile:2714: git.o] Error 1 Here I think the compiler is complaining about the lack of "restrict" annotations in our version, but even if we matched it completely (and there is no way to match all platforms anyway), it would still complain about a static declaration following a non-static one. Using macros doesn't have this problem, because the C preprocessor rewrites the name in our code before we hit this level of compilation. One way to fix this would just be to revert most of 15b52a4. What we really cared about there was catching build problems with precompose_argv(), which most platforms _don't_ build, and which is our custom function. So we could just switch the system wrappers back to macros; most people build the real versions anyway, and they don't change. So the extra type-checking isn't likely to catch bugs. But with a little work, we can have our cake and eat it, too. If we define the type-checking wrappers with a unique name, and then redirect the system names to them with macros, we still get our type checking, but without redeclaring the system function names. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
1 parent abd4d67 commit e0c08a4

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+8
-3
lines changed

git-compat-util.h

Lines changed: 8 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -274,9 +274,12 @@ struct itimerval {
274274
#endif
275275

276276
#ifdef NO_SETITIMER
277-
static inline int setitimer(int which, const struct itimerval *value, struct itimerval *newvalue) {
277+
static inline int git_setitimer(int which,
278+
const struct itimerval *value,
279+
struct itimerval *newvalue) {
278280
return 0; /* pretend success */
279281
}
282+
#define setitimer(which,value,ovalue) git_setitimer(which,value,ovalue)
280283
#endif
281284

282285
#ifndef NO_LIBGEN_H
@@ -1312,14 +1315,16 @@ int warn_on_fopen_errors(const char *path);
13121315
#endif
13131316

13141317
#ifndef _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS
1315-
static inline void flockfile(FILE *fh)
1318+
static inline void git_flockfile(FILE *fh)
13161319
{
13171320
; /* nothing */
13181321
}
1319-
static inline void funlockfile(FILE *fh)
1322+
static inline void git_funlockfile(FILE *fh)
13201323
{
13211324
; /* nothing */
13221325
}
1326+
#define flockfile(fh) git_flockfile(fh)
1327+
#define funlockfile(fh) git_funlockfile(fh)
13231328
#define getc_unlocked(fh) getc(fh)
13241329
#endif
13251330

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)