rev-list: update a NEEDSWORK comment

The comment is poorly phrased and it in't clear what it wanted to
say.  Strongly discourage this broken pattern to be copied and
pasted to other code paths.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>

Author: gitster

builtin/rev-list.c

@@ -650,17 +650,21 @@ int cmd_rev_list(int argc,
 	 *
 	 * Let "--missing" to conditionally set fetch_if_missing.
 	 */
+
 	/*
-	 * NEEDSWORK: These loops that attempt to find presence of
-	 * options without understanding that the options they are
-	 * skipping are broken (e.g., it would not know "--grep
+	 * NEEDSWORK: The next loop is utterly broken.  It tries to
+	 * notice an option is used, but without understanding if each
+	 * option takes an argument, which fundamentally would not
+	 * work.  It would not know "--grep
 	 * --exclude-promisor-objects" is not triggering
-	 * "--exclude-promisor-objects" option).  We really need
-	 * setup_revisions() to have a mechanism to allow and disallow
-	 * some sets of options for different commands (like rev-list,
-	 * replay, etc). Such a mechanism should do an early parsing
-	 * of options and be able to manage the `--missing=...` and
-	 * `--exclude-promisor-objects` options below.
+	 * "--exclude-promisor-objects" option, for example.
+	 *
+	 * We really need setup_revisions() to have a mechanism to
+	 * allow and disallow some sets of options for different
+	 * commands (like rev-list, replay, etc). Such a mechanism
+	 * should do an early parsing of options and be able to manage
+	 * the `--missing=...` and `--exclude-promisor-objects`
+	 * options below.
 	 */
 	for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
 		const char *arg = argv[i];