-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 361
Open
Description
Following is the code in alpaca.js version 1.5.27 Line number 24336 to 24344
Any one know the reason to not include the field that is dependent on hidden field although hidden field value included in the value
I think following check should be removed.
//
// NESTED HIDDENS DEPENDENCY HIDES (ALPACA EXTENSION)
//
// final check: only set valid if the dependentOnPropertyId is showing
if (dependentOnField && dependentOnField.isHidden())
{
valid = false;
}
return valid;
as per following example field2 value is not included in the alpaca.getValue() and getting value as {'field1': 'Value1'} instead of {'field1': 'Value1', 'field2': '100'}
var alpaca = $('#form').alpaca();
var value = alpaca.getValue();
Here is the json schema:
{
"$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$id":"https://gso.org.sa/aajel/api/json/schema?version=1",
"description":"Here is custom form generated by json schema using alpaca",
"type":"object",
"dependencies": {
"field2": ["field1"]
},
"properties":{
"field1": {
"type":"string",
"enum":[
"Value1",
"Value2"
]
},
"field2":{
"type":"string",
"enum":[
"100",
"200",
"300",
"400"
]
}
}
}
Here is the options:
{
"fields":{
"field1":{"type": "hidden", "default": "Value1"},
"field2":{
"dependencies": {
"field1": 'Value1'
}
}
}
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels