You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
submodule--helper: free rest of "displaypath" in "struct update_data"
Fix a leak in code added in c51f8f9 (submodule--helper: run update
procedures from C, 2021-08-24), we clobber the "displaypath" member of
the passed-in "struct update_data" both so that die() messages in this
update_submodule() function itself can use it, and for the
run_update_procedure() called within this function.
Fix a leak in code added in 51f8f94e5b (submodule--helper: run update
procedures from C, 2021-08-24). We'd always clobber the old
"displaypath" member of the previously passed-in "struct update_data".
A better fix for this would be to remove the "displaypath" member from
the "struct update_data" entirely. Along with "oid", "suboid",
"just_cloned" and "sm_path" it's managing members that mainly need to
be passed between 1-3 stack frames of functions adjacent to this
code. But doing so would be a much larger change (I have it locally,
and fully untangling that in an incremental way is a 10 patch
journey).
So let's go for this much more isolated fix suggested by Glen. We
FREE_AND_NULL() the "update_data->displaypath", the "AND_NULL()" part
of that is needed due to the later "free(ud->displaypath)" in
"update_data_release()" introduced in the preceding commit
Moving ensure_core_worktree() out of update_submodule() may not be
strictly required, but in doing so we are left with the exact same
ordering as before, making this a smaller functional change.
Helped-by: Glen Choo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Glen Choo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
0 commit comments