You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since 2c33f75 (Teach git-describe --exact-match to avoid expensive
tag searches, 2008-02-24) git describe accepts --no-exact-match, but it
does the same as --exact-match, an alias for --candidates=0. That's
because it's defined using OPT_SET_INT with a value of 0, which sets 0
when negated as well.
Let --no-exact-match set the number of candidates to the default value
instead. Users that need a more specific lack of exactitude can specify
their preferred value using --candidates, as before.
The "--no-exact-match" option was not covered in the tests, so let's
add a few. Also add a case where --exact-match option is used on a
commit that cannot be described without distance from tags and make
sure the command fails.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <[email protected]>
[jc: added trivial tests]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
0 commit comments