Skip to content

πŸ“Š Claude Token Usage Report2026-04-02Β #1629

@github-actions

Description

@github-actions

Overview

Period: 2026-04-02T21:10Z (last 24 hours, since previous report at 17:26Z)
Runs analyzed: 1 of 1 Claude-engine workflow run
Total tokens: 79K across all workflows
Estimated total cost: $0.18

One Claude-engine workflow ran during this period: Secret Digger (Claude) β€” its first appearance in token tracking reports. No smoke-claude or security-guard runs occurred since the previous report.


Workflow Summary

Workflow Runs Total Tokens Cost Cache Rate I/O Ratio Top Model
secret-digger-claude 1 79K $0.18 99.7% 31:1 sonnet-4.6

πŸ” Optimization Opportunities

  1. ℹ️ secret-digger-claude β€” High cache write rate (50.6%) β€” This is expected for a short 3-request conversation (1 haiku + 2 sonnet turns). The first sonnet turn writes 38K cache tokens; the second reads them back at 99.7% hit rate. Pattern is healthy for a 2-turn agent run.

    • Recommendation: No action needed. If the workflow grows to more turns, cache reuse ratio (read/write) will improve further.
  2. ℹ️ No cache on haiku requests β€” The initial haiku classification call has zero cache tokens. At 123 input tokens and $0.0005 cost, this is negligible.

    • Recommendation: Low priority. Add cache breakpoints only if haiku usage scales to >20 requests/run.

Per-Workflow Details

secret-digger-claude

  • Run: Β§23920074040 β€” main branch
  • Requests: 3 total
  • Models: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 (1 req), claude-sonnet-4-6 (2 reqs)
  • Tokens: 79K total (127 input, 1,230 output, 38,275 cache_read, 39,376 cache_write)
  • Cache hit rate: 99.7%
  • Cache write rate: 50.6%
  • I/O ratio: 31:1
  • Avg latency: 10,547ms/request
  • Estimated cost: $0.18

Request breakdown:

# Model Input Output Cache Read Cache Write Duration
1 haiku-4-5 123 95 0 0 1,261ms
2 sonnet-4-6 3 1,082 0 38,275 27,542ms
3 sonnet-4-6 1 53 38,275 1,101 2,837ms

Cost breakdown:

  • Sonnet cache writes: $0.16 (88%)
  • Sonnet cache reads: $0.01 (7%)
  • Sonnet output: $0.02 (11%)
  • Haiku (all): $0.0005 (<1%)
Workflows Without Token Data

The following Claude-engine workflows did not run during this period:

  • smoke-claude β€” 0 runs since last report
  • security-guard β€” 0 runs since last report
  • security-review β€” 0 runs since last report

Agentic Maintenance (run Β§23921352791) ran but had no agent-artifacts β€” it does not use --enable-api-proxy.


Historical Trend

Previous report: πŸ“Š Claude Token Usage Report 2026-04-02 (issue #1606, created 2026-04-02T17:26Z)

Baseline from previous report (smoke-claude):

  • Per-run cost: ~$0.24 | Per-run tokens: ~203K | Cache hit rate: ~99.5%

secret-digger-claude is a new workflow in token tracking β€” no prior baseline to compare against. Its first run shows healthy caching behavior and a cost of $0.18.

Comparison:

Metric smoke-claude (prev) secret-digger-claude (new)
Tokens/run ~203K ~79K
Cost/run ~$0.24 $0.18
Cache hit rate ~99.5% 99.7%
Requests/run ~6 3

secret-digger-claude is significantly more token-efficient per run than smoke-claude, likely because it performs a narrower task in fewer turns.


Previous Report

πŸ“Š Claude Token Usage Report 2026-04-02 β€” Issue #1606

References:

Generated by Daily Claude Token Usage Analyzer Β· β—·

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions