Skip to content

Conversation

@kylos101
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Follow-up on #20624

Related Issue(s)

Fixes CLC-1171

How to test

This works after landing on main:

docker pull eu.gcr.io/gitpod-core-dev/build/scheduler-extender:c1925d8

Documentation

Preview status

gitpod:summary

Build Options

Build
  • /werft with-werft
    Run the build with werft instead of GHA
  • leeway-no-cache
  • /werft no-test
    Run Leeway with --dont-test
Publish
  • /werft publish-to-npm
  • /werft publish-to-jb-marketplace
Installer
  • analytics=segment
  • with-dedicated-emulation
  • workspace-feature-flags
    Add desired feature flags to the end of the line above, space separated
Preview Environment / Integration Tests
  • /werft with-local-preview
    If enabled this will build install/preview
  • /werft with-preview
  • /werft with-large-vm
  • /werft with-gce-vm
    If enabled this will create the environment on GCE infra
  • /werft preemptible
    Saves cost. Untick this only if you're really sure you need a non-preemtible machine.
  • with-integration-tests=all
    Valid options are all, workspace, webapp, ide, jetbrains, vscode, ssh. If enabled, with-preview and with-large-vm will be enabled.
  • with-monitoring

/hold

@kylos101 kylos101 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 24, 2025 22:15
Comment on lines +65 to +71
/components/ipfs/kubo @gitpod-io/team-experience @gitpod-io/team-enterprise
/components/ipfs/ipfs-cluster @gitpod-io/team-experience @gitpod-io/team-enterprise
/components/public-api/gitpod/experimental @gitpod-io/team-experience @gitpod-io/team-enterprise
/components/public-api-server @gitpod-io/team-experience @gitpod-io/team-enterprise
/components/registry-facade-api @gitpod-io/team-engine @gitpod-io/team-enterprise
/components/registry-facade @gitpod-io/team-engine @gitpod-io/team-enterprise
/components/scheduler-extender @gitpod-io/team-engine @gitpod-io/team-enterprise
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@csweichel or @evahyder , could I ask for a ✅ ? This way, classic team can manage these related components more easily.

Copy link
Member

@geropl geropl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️

@roboquat roboquat merged commit e10d57d into main Feb 25, 2025
19 checks passed
@roboquat roboquat deleted the kylos101/fix-CLC-1171 branch February 25, 2025 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants