-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
Closed as not planned
Labels
Description
🔖 Feature description
R2 provided API that is fully compatible with the Amazon AWS S3.
Why not support AWS S3, then? It is a "low-hanging fruit".
🎤 Why is this feature needed ?
The S3 bucket has a lot of excellent options that developers love. Many developers already have their own AWS accounts, and for self-hosting solutions, it can be a valuable option.
✌️ How do you aim to achieve this?
- update
.env.*
file configuration, and add additional optional variables that allow configuring of the hoster/provider for the S3 client - A small terraform script that allows the creation of a s3 bucket with a lifetime policy (store image file for 24h)
🔄️ Additional Information
minio also provides S3 API-compatible interface, and it can be run in a docker container. So it can be used for local testing.
👀 Have you spent some time to check if this feature request has been raised before?
- I checked and didn't find similar issue
Are you willing to submit PR?
Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
victor-sm, nevo-david, MikeKMiller, hmd-ai, sunjam and 2 more