Replies: 1 comment
-
related: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753618 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, we have two types of build on Linux/macOS:
full
andmini
And on Windows:
full-msmpi
,full
, andmini
I think we can restructure this.
Firstly I think the name
mini
is not intuitive. From the previous discussion (#902), I was able to understand the main purpose to havemini
build is for headless HPCs (since it targets HPCs, it makes sense to enable MPI with this).But then, I think that it is too much to disable everything with
mini
builds. For example, plplot can work without GUI, and this can be used to plot to files... In principle, I think we can keep everything without wxWidgets?Also, I suggest changing the name
mini
to something more intuitive, more clear it is targeting HPCs. How aboutheadless
? Also rather thanfull
, I would say something likestandard
. I am open to any other name suggestions too.My suggestion:
headless
: we just get rid of wxWidgets, and keep everything else + MPIstandard
: everything without MPIBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions