Passing in variable instead of variable instance should give a better description

[MM4096]

In my project, I have a parameter in a function of type inventory_item. I accidentally passed in inventory_item (the class) instead of item (the resource). The editor gives a very error: Parser Error at (line, column): Invalid argument for "add_item()" function: argument 1 should be "inventory_item" but is "inventory_item" (screenshot below).

What I suggest is a more detailed message, like "... argument 1 should be of type "inventory_item" but is generalized class "inventory_item". This is by no means a wonderful error message, but something similar could possibly help someone, and avoid confusion.