|
| 1 | +// Copyright 2021 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. |
| 2 | +// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style |
| 3 | +// license that can be found in the LICENSE file. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +// Package reflectvaluecompare defines an Analyzer that checks for accidentally |
| 6 | +// using == or reflect.DeepEqual to compare reflect.Value values. |
| 7 | +// See issues 43993 and 18871. |
| 8 | +package reflectvaluecompare |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +import ( |
| 11 | + "go/ast" |
| 12 | + "go/token" |
| 13 | + "go/types" |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | + "golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis" |
| 16 | + "golang.org/x/tools/go/analysis/passes/inspect" |
| 17 | + "golang.org/x/tools/go/ast/inspector" |
| 18 | + "golang.org/x/tools/go/types/typeutil" |
| 19 | +) |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +const Doc = `check for comparing reflect.Value values with == or reflect.DeepEqual |
| 22 | +
|
| 23 | +The reflectvaluecompare checker looks for expressions of the form: |
| 24 | +
|
| 25 | + v1 == v2 |
| 26 | + v1 != v2 |
| 27 | + reflect.DeepEqual(v1, v2) |
| 28 | +
|
| 29 | +where v1 or v2 are reflect.Values. Comparing reflect.Values directly |
| 30 | +is almost certainly not correct, as it compares the reflect package's |
| 31 | +internal representation, not the underlying value. |
| 32 | +Likely what is intended is: |
| 33 | +
|
| 34 | + v1.Interface() == v2.Interface() |
| 35 | + v1.Interface() != v2.Interface() |
| 36 | + reflect.DeepEqual(v1.Interface(), v2.Interface()) |
| 37 | +` |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +var Analyzer = &analysis.Analyzer{ |
| 40 | + Name: "reflectvaluecompare", |
| 41 | + Doc: Doc, |
| 42 | + Requires: []*analysis.Analyzer{inspect.Analyzer}, |
| 43 | + Run: run, |
| 44 | +} |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +func run(pass *analysis.Pass) (interface{}, error) { |
| 47 | + inspect := pass.ResultOf[inspect.Analyzer].(*inspector.Inspector) |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + nodeFilter := []ast.Node{ |
| 50 | + (*ast.BinaryExpr)(nil), |
| 51 | + (*ast.CallExpr)(nil), |
| 52 | + } |
| 53 | + inspect.Preorder(nodeFilter, func(n ast.Node) { |
| 54 | + switch n := n.(type) { |
| 55 | + case *ast.BinaryExpr: |
| 56 | + if n.Op != token.EQL && n.Op != token.NEQ { |
| 57 | + return |
| 58 | + } |
| 59 | + if isReflectValue(pass, n.X) || isReflectValue(pass, n.Y) { |
| 60 | + if n.Op == token.EQL { |
| 61 | + pass.ReportRangef(n, "avoid using == with reflect.Value") |
| 62 | + } else { |
| 63 | + pass.ReportRangef(n, "avoid using != with reflect.Value") |
| 64 | + } |
| 65 | + } |
| 66 | + case *ast.CallExpr: |
| 67 | + fn, ok := typeutil.Callee(pass.TypesInfo, n).(*types.Func) |
| 68 | + if !ok { |
| 69 | + return |
| 70 | + } |
| 71 | + if fn.FullName() == "reflect.DeepEqual" && (isReflectValue(pass, n.Args[0]) || isReflectValue(pass, n.Args[1])) { |
| 72 | + pass.ReportRangef(n, "avoid using reflect.DeepEqual with reflect.Value") |
| 73 | + } |
| 74 | + } |
| 75 | + }) |
| 76 | + return nil, nil |
| 77 | +} |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +// isReflectValue reports whether the type of e is reflect.Value. |
| 80 | +func isReflectValue(pass *analysis.Pass, e ast.Expr) bool { |
| 81 | + tv, ok := pass.TypesInfo.Types[e] |
| 82 | + if !ok { // no type info, something else is wrong |
| 83 | + return false |
| 84 | + } |
| 85 | + // See if the type is reflect.Value |
| 86 | + named, ok := tv.Type.(*types.Named) |
| 87 | + if !ok { |
| 88 | + return false |
| 89 | + } |
| 90 | + if obj := named.Obj(); obj == nil || obj.Pkg() == nil || obj.Pkg().Path() != "reflect" || obj.Name() != "Value" { |
| 91 | + return false |
| 92 | + } |
| 93 | + if _, ok := e.(*ast.CompositeLit); ok { |
| 94 | + // This is reflect.Value{}. Don't treat that as an error. |
| 95 | + // Users should probably use x.IsValid() rather than x == reflect.Value{}, but the latter isn't wrong. |
| 96 | + return false |
| 97 | + } |
| 98 | + return true |
| 99 | +} |
0 commit comments