revive: invalid line number 526 (should be < 230)

[caichao1103]

Welcome

• Yes, I'm using a binary release within 2 latest releases. Only such installations are supported.
• Yes, I've searched similar issues on GitHub and didn't find any.
• Yes, I've read the typecheck section of the FAQ.
• Yes, I've tried with the standalone linter if available (e.g., gocritic, go vet, etc.).
• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

Description of the problem

Panic: the_only_name: package "upgrade" (isInitialPkg: true, needAnalyzeSource: true): invalid line number 526 (should be < 230)

Version of golangci-lint

$ golangci-lint --version
v1.63.3

Configuration

# paste configuration file or CLI flags here

Go environment

$ go version && go env
# paste output here

Verbose output of running

$ golangci-lint cache clean
$ golangci-lint run -v
level=error msg="[runner] Panic: the_only_name: package \"upgrade\" (isInitialPkg: true, needAnalyzeSource: true): invalid line number 526 (should be < 230): goroutine 118016 [running]:\nruntime/debug.Stack()\n\truntime/debug/stack.go:26 +0x5e\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis.(*action).analyzeSafe.func1()\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis/runner_action.go:50 +0x277\npanic({0x11be420?, 0xc093345b70?})\n\truntime/panic.go:785 +0x132\ngo/token.(*File).LineStart(0xc001c6ce80?, 0x386e?)\n\tgo/token/position.go:232 +0x168\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/golinters/revive.toIssue(0xc024696d20, 0xc049eb2440)\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/golinters/revive/revive.go:187 +0x24c\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/golinters/revive.(*wrapper).run(0xc00190e080, 0xc0007180c0, 0xc024696d20)\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/golinters/revive/revive.go:156 +0x4d2\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/golinters/revive.New.func1.1(0x0?)\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/golinters/revive/revive.go:61 +0x37\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis.(*action).analyze.func3(0xc0068b9560, 0xc024696d20)\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis/runner_checker.go:182 +0xeb\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis.(*action).analyze(0xc0068b9560)\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis/runner_checker.go:208 +0xa9c\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/timeutils.(*Stopwatch).TrackStage(0xc001f3d310, {0x141c83e, 0xd}, 0xc005f47f48)\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/timeutils/stopwatch.go:111 +0x44\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis.(*action).analyzeSafe(0x0?)\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis/runner_action.go:54 +0x71\ngithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis.(*loadingPackage).analyze.func2(0xc0068b9560)\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis/runner_loadingpackage.go:83 +0xa5\ncreated by github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis.(*loadingPackage).analyze in goroutine 3921\n\tgithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/pkg/goanalysis/runner_loadingpackage.go:78 +0x1e9\n"

level=error msg="Running error: can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter\ngoanalysis_metalinter: the_only_name: package \"upgrade\" (isInitialPkg: true, needAnalyzeSource: true): invalid line number 526 (should be < 230)"

A minimal reproducible example or link to a public repository

// add your code here

Validation

• Yes, I've included all information above (version, config, etc.).

Supporter

• I am a sponsor/backer through GitHub or OpenCollective

[boring-cyborg]

Hey, thank you for opening your first Issue ! 🙂 If you would like to contribute we have a guide for contributors.

[ldez]

Hello @caichao1103,

To be able to process your issue as quickly as possible,
can you edit your issue to add missing elements, fix the invalid elements, and complete the sections?

Section	Status
Welcome	🟢
Description of the problem	🟠
Version of golangci-lint	🟠
Configuration	🔴
Go environment	🔴
Verbose output of running	🟠
A minimal reproducible example or link to a public repository	🔴
Validation	🔴
Supporter	🟢

Legend:

• 🟢: The section is complete and valid.
• 🟠: The section is incomplete.
• 🔴: The section is missing or invalid.

[ldez]

potentially fixed by #5291 but as this issue is 90% incomplete it's not possible to check that.