Replies: 3 comments
-
|
Response from ADK Answering Agent (experimental, answer may be inaccurate) TLDR: The most robust method to guarantee schema validation is to use a multi-agent "Generator-Critic" pattern, where one agent generates the output and a second agent validates it. For simpler cases, you can use an That's an excellent question about ensuring output reliability. Here are some recommended patterns and practices based on ADK's capabilities: 1. The Generator-Critic Pattern (Most Robust)The cleanest and most powerful way to enforce output structure is by using a multi-agent pattern where different agents have different responsibilities. [1] You can orchestrate this using a
2. Using Callbacks for Validation (Simpler)For less complex scenarios, you can use callbacks as a lightweight way to inspect and intercept the agent's process. [2]
3. How to Emit a Safe Final EventWhen validation fails in a callback or a Critic agent, you can emit a custom, safe event. This ensures your frontend always receives a predictable structure. # Inside an agent or callback
if validation_failed:
yield Event(
author=self.name,
content={"status": "error", "message": "Output validation failed."}
)4. Schema for Intermediate EventsYou asked if intermediate events should follow a schema. While not strictly enforced by the framework for all events, it is a strong best practice. [3] ADK's own components for logging and analytics rely on a consistent event structure. Defining a schema for your intermediate events will make your application much easier to debug, extend, and maintain. Finally, it's worth noting that ADK now supports using [1] https://google.github.io/adk-docs/agents/multi-agents/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
thanks adk-bot, your service is greatly appreciated |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Response from ADK Answering Agent (experimental, answer may be inaccurate) TLDR: ADK strictly enforces the Hello! That's an excellent question about ensuring API contract stability when working with LLMs. Here is some guidance based on ADK's design and best practices. Schema Enforcement and FallbackWhen you define an If the LLM produces an output that is not a valid JSON or does not match the structure of your Pydantic model (e.g., missing fields, incorrect types), the ADK will raise a ADK does not have a built-in automatic fallback mechanism. The intended pattern is for you to handle these validation failures explicitly in your application code. The best practice is to wrap the agent invocation (e.g., in a call to from pydantic import ValidationError
try:
# This is where you run your agent
final_event = await agent.run_async(prompt="...")
# Process the successful, validated response
except ValidationError as e:
# Fallback logic here
print(f"Schema validation failed: {e}")
# You can emit a safe, default final event, or a custom error message.
# For example:
# final_event = {'error': 'Model output failed validation', 'details': str(e)}Emitting a Safe Final EventAs shown in the example above, your
This explicit error handling ensures that your application maintains a stable contract with the frontend, even when the model deviates. Schema for Intermediate EventsThe For agents that use both tools and an There is no requirement or mechanism to enforce a custom schema on these intermediate events. Their structure is integral to how the agent reasons and executes tasks. I hope this guidance helps you build more robust and reliable applications with ADK! [1] Publicly accessible HTTPS URL of the document: https://google.github.io/adk-docs/agents/llm-agents/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm Using:
LLMAgent(
name="MyAgent",
instructions="...",
output_schema=MySchema
)
If the LLM produces invalid structure or missing fields, Pydantic validation fails and the frontend receives an unpredictable response.
What is the best practice to guarantee that final outputs always match output_schema?
Specifically:
Where should schema enforcement + fallback happen?
How to emit a safe final event when validation fails?
Should intermediate events also follow a minimal schema?
Looking for official ADK guidance or production patterns to keep the contract stable when the model deviates.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions