Skip to content

Conversation

eopXD
Copy link
Contributor

@eopXD eopXD commented Nov 20, 2022

No description provided.

@eopXD eopXD force-pushed the loop-unroll branch 3 times, most recently from d6780b3 to 619a770 Compare December 4, 2022 10:56
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
from compiler_opt.rl import policy_saver

_COMPILATION_TIMEOUT = flags.DEFINE_integer(
'compilation_timeout', 60,
'compilation_timeout', 120,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you revert it back?

@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ def main(_) -> None:
parser_fn = create_tfrecord_parser_fn(sequence_features)
dataset = dataset.map(parser_fn, num_parallel_calls=tf.data.AUTOTUNE)
data_list = np.array(list(dataset.as_numpy_iterator()), dtype=object)
data_list = np.transpose(data_list, [1, 0])
data_list = np.transpose(data_list, [1, 0, 2])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's this change for?

@gin.configurable()
def get_unroll_signature_spec():
"""Returns (time_step_spec, action_spec) for LLVM loop unroll."""
# LINT.IfChange
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete # LINT.IfChange

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Jan 29, 2025

git conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants