Replies: 11 comments
-
|
Regarding gamma, have you tried changing the exposure? As for differences with other renderers, we have actually made a fair bit of effort to converge the various glTF renderers (though Babylon.js has a known brightness shift we had to correct for here). If you can share some screenshots of comparisons you've made, that would be helpful. I'm not quite sure what you mean about viewing interiors (seems to work fine in your demo for me). You are welcome to set the camera radius to zero (you'll first need to set the minimum radius to zero and orbit-sensitivity to -1). Disabling zoom entirely is a reasonable feature request. I might not even need a new API for it; how about if the minimum and maximum radius and field of view are equal, then we can deduce zooming is impossible and not take over the wheel in that case. Would that be reasonable? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Camera seems to be orthographic, that means I can't go behind the wall with a camera, that is what I meant. I will test out what you suggested.
Yes I already did that to remove zooming but I don't know how to allow page scrolling instead of modelviewer.
I will in few hours. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Blender: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
and original texture: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ah i realized default gamma value was 2.2 not 2, so they are a little bit brighter than in the picture but still too dark for me. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The primary difference between the three viewers you're showing is they all use different lighting. I would recommend crafting your own HDR environment and setting it using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I've used emissive materials on all of them with disabled lighting |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That's an interesting approach, but runs counter to the concept of physically-based rendering. There be dragons... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@ZeusLT - by clipping planes, were you referring the ability to do a cross section through a 3D model? Here are a few examples from three.js:
What @elalish suggests allows you to "stand inside" the model, but for archiviz (as well as medical visualization), the ability to control cross-sections in modelviewer would be incredibly useful! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@mjvo you're the second user to ask for cross-sections. I agree that would be cool, though it's not on my short list of features to implement. However, if you're interested, I'd be happy to merge a contribution along these lines. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@mjvo I was thinking of something more simple, to have a camera move past a part of model, but what you shared works as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
Is there a way to adjust near/far clipping planes so we could view interiors? (view live demo)
Gamma, I have found that model-viewer models are darker than in other software (when both are without environment maps), I think it might have something to do with gamma values.
Changing value in line 56409 -
this.threeRenderer.gammaFactor = 3;seems to do the trick for me, but I don't want to have this file local just because of 1 modified value.Scrolling, I need a way to allow page scrolling with a mouse wheel when hovering over model-viewer. Maybe this #1679 or this #1424 (I don't feel any difference after the update)
tl;dr: please expose clipping planes and gamma settings, add controls-ignorezooming-allowpagescrolling attribute.
Live Demo
https://archy.lt/modelviewer/
(It is fairly not optimized at this point, 100MB file, might take a while to load)
Version
Browser Affected
OS
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions