Fix incorrect formatting in the FAQ (#2296)

Add a line break to prevent a section being considered part of the
previous one.

Also fix a minor grammatical inconsistency.

Author: oliverchang

docs/faq.md

@@ -69,9 +69,10 @@ present (but empty) in the [data exports](#is-the-database-available-to-download
 Records that have the [`withdrawn`](https://ossf.github.io/osv-schema/#withdrawn-field) field set will be excluded from:
 * the responses to POST API queries
 * the main [list page](https://osv.dev/list) and related search results
-The entry remains in the database, and:
-* is returned by the `/vulns/<ID>` GET API
-* is visible at `https://osv.dev/vulnerability/<ID>` page (and clearly visibly marked as "withdrawn")
+
+The entry remains in the database, and is:
+* returned by the `/vulns/<ID>` GET API
+* visible at `https://osv.dev/vulnerability/<ID>` page (and clearly visibly marked as "withdrawn")
 * still exported in the [GCS exports](#is-the-database-available-to-download) (including the `withdrawn` field)
 
 ## How does OSV.dev handle deleted records?