Replies: 1 comment
-
I found a bit of prior art that uses the Chromium project instead:
https://style.mla.org/citing-source-code/, so I think something like that
would be fine with "S2 Authors" instead. Otherwise no strong opinions from
me :)
…On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 9:15 AM Christopher Krapu ***@***.***> wrote:
What would be the best way to cite this work? Currently, I was planning to
do this:
S2 Developers. “S2 Geometry Library,” http://s2geometry.io/. Accessed
January 14, 2024.
Is there a more appropriate article or set of authors to list?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#340>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGEMKWX5JTELHAN27S7PF3YOVIZXAVCNFSM6AAAAABB3QR3BOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGA4DEMZTGUZDMNY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What would be the best way to cite this work? Currently, I was planning to do this:
S2 Developers. “S2 Geometry Library,” http://s2geometry.io/. Accessed January 14, 2024.
Is there a more appropriate article or set of authors to list?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions