edits

Author: idalithb

website/pages/en/querying/querying-best-practices.mdx

@@ -2,11 +2,9 @@
 title: Querying Best Practices
 ---
 
-The Graph provides a decentralized way to query data from blockchains.
+The Graph provides a decentralized way to query data from blockchains via GraphQL API, making it easier to query data with the GraphQL language.
 
-The Graph network's data is exposed through a GraphQL API, making it easier to query data with the GraphQL language.
-
-This page will guide you through the essential GraphQL language rules and GraphQL queries best practices.
+Learn the essential GraphQL language rules and GraphQL queries best practices.
 
 ---
 
@@ -71,7 +69,7 @@ GraphQL is a language and set of conventions that transport over HTTP.
 
 It means that you can query a GraphQL API using standard `fetch` (natively or via `@whatwg-node/fetch` or `isomorphic-fetch`).
 
-However, as stated in ["Querying from an Application"](/querying/querying-from-an-application), we recommend you to use our `graph-client` that supports unique features such as:
+However, as stated in ["Querying from an Application"](/querying/querying-from-an-application), it's recommend to use `graph-client` which supports unique features such as:
 
 - Cross-chain Subgraph Handling: Querying from multiple subgraphs in a single query
 - [Automatic Block Tracking](https://github.com/graphprotocol/graph-client/blob/main/packages/block-tracking/README.md)
@@ -104,8 +102,6 @@ main()
 
 More GraphQL client alternatives are covered in ["Querying from an Application"](/querying/querying-from-an-application).
 
-Now that we covered the basic rules of GraphQL queries syntax, let's now look at the best practices of GraphQL query writing.
-
 ---
 
 ## Best Practices
@@ -164,11 +160,11 @@ Doing so brings **many advantages**:
 - **Variables can be cached** at server-level
 - **Queries can be statically analyzed by tools** (more on this in the following sections)
 
-**Note: How to include fields conditionally in static queries**
+### How to include fields conditionally in static queries
 
-We might want to include the `owner` field only on a particular condition.
+You might want to include the `owner` field only on a particular condition.
 
-For this, we can leverage the `@include(if:...)` directive as follows:
+For this, you can leverage the `@include(if:...)` directive as follows:
 
 ```tsx
 import { execute } from 'your-favorite-graphql-client'
@@ -191,17 +187,18 @@ const result = await execute(query, {
 })
 ```
 
-Note: The opposite directive is `@skip(if: ...)`.
+> Note: The opposite directive is `@skip(if: ...)`.
 
 ### Ask for what you want
 
 GraphQL became famous for its "Ask for what you want" tagline.
 
 For this reason, there is no way, in GraphQL, to get all available fields without having to list them individually.
 
-When querying GraphQL APIs, always think of querying only the fields that will be actually used.
-
-A common cause of over-fetching is collections of entities. By default, queries will fetch 100 entities in a collection, which is usually much more than what will actually be used, e.g., for display to the user. Queries should therefore almost always set first explicitly, and make sure they only fetch as many entities as they actually need. This applies not just to top-level collections in a query, but even more so to nested collections of entities.
+- When querying GraphQL APIs, always think of querying only the fields that will be actually used.
+- A common cause of over-fetching is collections of entities. By default, queries will fetch 100 entities in a collection, which is usually much more than what will actually be used, e.g., for display to the user.
+- Queries should always be set first explicitly.
+  - Make sure queries only fetch as many entities as they actually need. This applies not just to top-level collections in a query, but even more so to nested collections of entities.
 
 For example, in the following query:
 
@@ -337,8 +334,8 @@ query {
 
 Such repeated fields (`id`, `active`, `status`) bring many issues:
 
-- harder to read for more extensive queries
-- when using tools that generate TypeScript types based on queries (_more on that in the last section_), `newDelegate` and `oldDelegate` will result in two distinct inline interfaces.
+- Harder to read for more extensive queries
+- When using tools that generate TypeScript types based on queries (_more on that in the last section_), `newDelegate` and `oldDelegate` will result in two distinct inline interfaces.
 
 A refactored version of the query would be the following:
 
@@ -364,13 +361,13 @@ fragment DelegateItem on Transcoder {
 }
 ```
 
-Using GraphQL `fragment` will improve readability (especially at scale) but also will result in better TypeScript types generation.
+Using GraphQL `fragment` will improve readability (especially at scale) and result in better TypeScript types generation.
 
 When using the types generation tool, the above query will generate a proper `DelegateItemFragment` type (_see last "Tools" section_).
 
 ### GraphQL Fragment do's and don'ts
 
-**Fragment base must be a type**
+### Fragment base must be a type
 
 A Fragment cannot be based on a non-applicable type, in short, **on type not having fields**:
 
@@ -382,7 +379,7 @@ fragment MyFragment on BigInt {
 
 `BigInt` is a **scalar** (native "plain" type) that cannot be used as a fragment's base.
 
-**How to spread a Fragment**
+#### How to spread a Fragment
 
 Fragments are defined on specific types and should be used accordingly in queries.
 
@@ -411,16 +408,16 @@ fragment VoteItem on Vote {
 
 It is not possible to spread a fragment of type `Vote` here.
 
-**Define Fragment as an atomic business unit of data**
+#### Define Fragment as an atomic business unit of data
 
 GraphQL Fragment must be defined based on their usage.
 
 For most use-case, defining one fragment per type (in the case of repeated fields usage or type generation) is sufficient.
 
 Here is a rule of thumb for using Fragment:
 
-- when fields of the same type are repeated in a query, group them in a Fragment
-- when similar but not the same fields are repeated, create multiple fragments, ex:
+- When fields of the same type are repeated in a query, group them in a Fragment
+- When similar but not the same fields are repeated, create multiple fragments, ex:
 
 ```graphql
 # base fragment (mostly used in listing)
@@ -443,7 +440,7 @@ fragment VoteWithPoll on Vote {
 
 ---
 
-## The essential tools
+## The Essential Tools
 
 ### GraphQL web-based explorers
 
@@ -473,21 +470,21 @@ This will allow you to **catch errors without even testing queries** on the play
 
 The [GraphQL VSCode extension](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=GraphQL.vscode-graphql) is an excellent addition to your development workflow to get:
 
-- syntax highlighting
-- autocomplete suggestions
-- validation against schema
-- snippets
-- go to definition for fragments and input types
+- Syntax highlighting
+- Autocomplete suggestions
+- Validation against schema
+- Snippets
+- Go to definition for fragments and input types
 
 If you are using `graphql-eslint`, the [ESLint VSCode extension](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=dbaeumer.vscode-eslint) is a must-have to visualize errors and warnings inlined in your code correctly.
 
 **WebStorm/Intellij and GraphQL**
 
 The [JS GraphQL plugin](https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/8097-graphql/) will significantly improve your experience while working with GraphQL by providing:
 
-- syntax highlighting
-- autocomplete suggestions
-- validation against schema
-- snippets
+- Syntax highlighting
+- Autocomplete suggestions
+- Validation against schema
+- Snippets
 
-More information on this [WebStorm article](https://blog.jetbrains.com/webstorm/2019/04/featured-plugin-js-graphql/) that showcases all the plugin's main features.
+For more information on this topic, check out the [WebStorm article](https://blog.jetbrains.com/webstorm/2019/04/featured-plugin-js-graphql/) which showcases all the plugin's main features.