Fix issue in source

Author: benface

website/src/pages/en/indexing/tooling/graph-node.mdx

@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ Database tables that store entities seem to generally come in two varieties: 'tr
 
 For account-like tables, `graph-node` can generate queries that take advantage of details of how Postgres ends up storing data with such a high rate of change, namely that all of the versions for recent blocks are in a small subsection of the overall storage for such a table.
 
-The command `graphman stats show <sgdNNNN`> shows, for each entity type/table in a deployment, how many distinct entities, and how many entity versions each table contains. That data is based on Postgres-internal estimates, and is therefore necessarily imprecise, and can be off by an order of magnitude. A `-1` in the `entities` column means that Postgres believes that all rows contain a distinct entity.
+The command `graphman stats show <sgdNNNN>` shows, for each entity type/table in a deployment, how many distinct entities, and how many entity versions each table contains. That data is based on Postgres-internal estimates, and is therefore necessarily imprecise, and can be off by an order of magnitude. A `-1` in the `entities` column means that Postgres believes that all rows contain a distinct entity.
 
 In general, tables where the number of distinct entities are less than 1% of the total number of rows/entity versions are good candidates for the account-like optimization. When the output of `graphman stats show` indicates that a table might benefit from this optimization, running `graphman stats show <sgdNNN> <table>` will perform a full count of the table - that can be slow, but gives a precise measure of the ratio of distinct entities to overall entity versions.