Improve error for "Subscription field must return Async Iterable. Received: undefined"

[thomassuckow]

The error thrown "Subscription field must return Async Iterable. Received: undefined" should include where in the schema it called the subscription field and it returned undefined.

[thomassuckow]

I had a slight misunderstanding about how subscriptions work so the solution is probably slightly different:
In my case I didn't provide a subscribe method on the field. So the error should actually complain that the subscribe method is missing and not that it returned undefined.

In either case, it should include the field name.

[theonlydaleking]

For anyone else here, i got this message from a typo in my "subscribe: () => {asyncIterator}"

I had subscibe *rolls eyes

[yaacovCR]

We use the default field resolver when the subscribe field resolver is not provided; that's why you get this message. Not sure how to fix this except by disabling that. I am going to close this as not planned for now, but if anyone thinks of a better way forward, feel free to comment/reopen!