Skip to content

Conversation

@phryneas
Copy link

@phryneas phryneas commented Sep 24, 2024

This would be one possible solution for #4201.

These enum members won't be used by any code in the 16.x branch, but they would be present to prevent TS errors.

Note that this would make these enum members stable, so if there is any intent to rename these before a final release, this PR should probably not get merged.

@phryneas phryneas requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2024 08:46
@phryneas
Copy link
Author

Probably better to fix up the packaging of graphql-language-server

@phryneas phryneas closed this Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant