Skip to content

Conversation

@saifsultanc
Copy link
Contributor

Context

⛑️ Ticket(s): https://secure.helpscout.net/conversation/2878525752/79569

Summary

The snippet is supposed to process feeds on a form when the entry is updated via GPEB, however, it's causing a critical error. Fixed the issue by adding a safety check.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Walkthrough

The change introduces a conditional check within the gform_addon_pre_process_feeds callback. The code verifies whether the $feeds variable is an array. If not, the function returns the input unchanged to prevent errors. When the input is an array, the function proceeds with filtering feeds based on an exclusion list.

Changes

File Changes Summary
gp-entry-blocks/gpeb-process-feeds-on-edit.php Added a conditional check to verify that $feeds is an array, with an early return if it is not, while preserving the existing feed filtering logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Callback as gform_addon_pre_process_feeds
    participant Feeds as $feeds Input

    Callback ->> Feeds: Verify if feeds is an array
    alt Feeds is not an array
        Callback -->> Feeds: Return original feeds
    else Feeds is an array
        Callback ->> Callback: Filter feeds based on exclusion list
        Callback -->> Feeds: Return filtered feeds
    end
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • veryspry

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link

Warnings
⚠️ When ready, don't forget to request reviews on this pull request from your fellow wizards.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against bb32446

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
gp-entry-blocks/gpeb-process-feeds-on-edit.php (2)

31-43: Consider adding logging for unexpected input types

While the fix appropriately handles non-array input, you might want to consider adding some form of logging when this unexpected condition occurs. This could help identify why $feeds occasionally isn't an array, which might point to an underlying issue elsewhere.

add_filter( 'gform_addon_pre_process_feeds', function( $feeds, $entry, $form ) use ( $excluded_feed_ids ) {
	// If no feeds are present, return.
	if ( ! is_array( $feeds ) ) {
+		// Log unexpected data type for debugging purposes
+		if ( function_exists( 'error_log' ) ) {
+			error_log( 'GPEB Process Feeds: Expected array for $feeds but received ' . gettype( $feeds ) );
+		}
		return $feeds;
	}

	// Filter feeds excluding the ones in the excluded feed ids array.

13-13: Consider making excluded feed IDs customizable

The excluded feed IDs (103, 104) are hardcoded. For better flexibility, consider making this a configurable option through a filter or constant. This would allow site administrators to customize the exclusion list without modifying the code.

// Array of feed ids to exclude for processing, if you want all feeds to be process use an empty array.
-$excluded_feed_ids = array( 103, 104 );
+$excluded_feed_ids = apply_filters( 'gpeb_process_feeds_excluded_ids', array( 103, 104 ) );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b9e42a and bb32446.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • gp-entry-blocks/gpeb-process-feeds-on-edit.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
gp-entry-blocks/gpeb-process-feeds-on-edit.php (1)

32-35: Good defensive programming addition!

Adding this safety check to verify that $feeds is an array before proceeding with array_filter() is an excellent fix. This prevents the fatal error that would occur when attempting to use array functions on non-array data. The comment is also clear and explains the purpose of this check.

@saifsultanc saifsultanc merged commit 62668ca into master Mar 19, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@saifsultanc saifsultanc deleted the saif/fix/79569-fix-gpep-fatal-error branch March 19, 2025 03:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants