Generic improvements and working on bugs: design, performance, memory consumption, contribution. #8
Description
In the PR#7, that has been already merged into the master,
there are a few notes to which it would be nice to receive some kind of reaction.
Ideally, in the form of code improvements.
I could be wrong, but from my external point of view, the original design of the Dictionary is bit better than the current one,
which now contains a number of compromise and questionable solutions designed to close some particular issues ASAP, but not to improve design itself. I think it is better to review all these notes, closing silently without any reaction is not a way.