NoSuchConstructorException

[e7]

net.greghaines.jesque.utils.NoSuchConstructorException: class=com.xxx.xxx.xxxx.TestAction args=[6]
	at net.greghaines.jesque.utils.ReflectionUtils.findConstructor(ReflectionUtils.java:205) ~[jesque-2.1.3.jar:na]
	at net.greghaines.jesque.utils.ReflectionUtils.createObject(ReflectionUtils.java:147) ~[jesque-2.1.3.jar:na]
	at net.greghaines.jesque.utils.JesqueUtils.materializeJob(JesqueUtils.java:415) ~[jesque-2.1.3.jar:na]
	at net.greghaines.jesque.worker.MapBasedJobFactory.materializeJob(MapBasedJobFactory.java:49) ~[jesque-2.1.3.jar:na]
	at net.greghaines.jesque.worker.WorkerImpl.process(WorkerImpl.java:605) [jesque-2.1.3.jar:na]
	at net.greghaines.jesque.worker.WorkerImpl.poll(WorkerImpl.java:449) [jesque-2.1.3.jar:na]
	at net.greghaines.jesque.worker.WorkerImpl.run(WorkerImpl.java:220) [jesque-2.1.3.jar:na]
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) ~[na:1.8.0_221]
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) ~[na:1.8.0_221]
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) ~[na:1.8.0_221]

There is a public TestAction(long id); constructor there actually, so I track code into net.greghaines.jesque.utils.ReflectionUtils.findConstructor, and found this:

            if (typeDiffWeight < minTypeDiffWeight) { // right here, should be `<=` ?
                // Choose this constructor if it represents the closest match.
                constructorToUse = candidate;
                minTypeDiffWeight = typeDiffWeight;
                ambiguousConstructors = null;
            } else if (constructorToUse != null && typeDiffWeight == minTypeDiffWeight) {
                if (ambiguousConstructors == null) {
                    ambiguousConstructors = new LinkedHashSet<Constructor<?>>();
                    ambiguousConstructors.add(constructorToUse);
                }
                ambiguousConstructors.add(candidate);
            }

[lrajlich]

I ran into the same problem. This is because, it appears that Jesque is treating the argument as an int and looking for a constructor matching it, (in this case I could match it to a constructor with int as an argument type). I was able to work around the problem by making the constructor use java.lang.Number as constructor argument type and using longValue method to assign the class member.