Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Ping, @grindsa |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
hi, sorry for letting you waiting. The idea of having additional protocol support sounds really interesting but I fear that I do not have the bandwidth to work on it. However patches are welcome at any time... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As the back end library grows with ever more pluggable back ends, I think it's becoming more desirable to also have the fronts pluggable.
My particular use case involves a client software that only supports the MS
certsrv"protocol", but I could also see SCEP being fairly straight forward to implement.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions