You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
2025 was a hard pill to swallow. The political ramifications of the year are, quite frankly, horrifying. We're so screwed, but, then, I could say that of every year for the last two decades. It only ever seems to get worse (_03/01/26 addendum: it did get worse)_. However, the subject of global politics is out-of-scope for my silly little blog. So, instead, here is how my year went.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/blog/alien-as-outside-context-entity-2/alien-as-outside-context-entity-2.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -26,15 +26,15 @@ In his classic space opera _A Fire Upon the Deep_, Vernor Vinge describes the ti
26
26
27
27
Vernor then completely undercuts this by having one of these creatures sit down at a reading desk to sip brandy and smoke a cigar. What happened?
28
28
29
-

29
+

30
30
31
31
## Xenopsychological parochialism
32
32
33
33
[Xenobiological universalism](/blog/alien-as-outside-context-entity/#xenobiological-universalism) is a powerful tool for imagining alternative forms of life, but it often ignores a key factor: psychology. [Star Trek futurism](/blog/alien-as-outside-context-entity/#star-trek-futurism) rears its ugly head once again. Science fiction imagines all kinds of exotic, intelligent aliens, but gives them very human-like concerns and motivations. By avoiding xenobiological parochialism we have stumbled into a new trap: _xenopsychological_ parochialism, the naive idea that intelligent alien life would share some kind of psychological affinity with us. Just as it is unlikely that we'd share a common biology with aliens, it seems even more unlikely we'd share a psychology.
34
34
35
35
<aside>
36
36
37
-

37
+

38
38
39
39
Here are some examples of xenopsychological science fiction:
40
40
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ If an alien could speak, why would it? Would we even know it was talking? Would
63
63
64
64
All very philosophical, but the point is that language is the crux of portraying alien psychology. An encounter with aliens should not just be a categorisation problem ("stones that can think!?") but should be a fundamental language problem. When we see an alien, we should not be able to fully articulate what we're looking at.
65
65
66
-

66
+

67
67
68
68
## Alien (1979), a case study
69
69
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ We understand what the xenomorph does, but the unanswered _why_ is what makes us
99
99
100
100
<aside>
101
101
102
-
[](/products/context)
102
+
[](/products/context)
103
103
104
104
This article was research for [CONT/EXT](/products/context), my upcoming britpunk one-shot for Mothership. Please follow or [subscribe](/mailing-list/) for updates.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/blog/alien-as-outside-context-entity/alien-as-outside-context-entity.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ But, how do you go about portraying incomprehensible aliens?
22
22
23
23
### Star Trek Futurism
24
24
25
-

25
+

26
26
27
27
Firstly, in order to question our assumptions about alien life, you need to understand Star Trek futurism. Star Trek futurism is the (often unconscious) bias that the future will be like the eponymous (and often nonsense) TV show. It's an optimistic vision of the future as it ought to be, with faster-than-light travel and (most relevant here) contact with ubiquitous, intelligent and human-like alien life.
28
28
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ But these creatures can never be terrifying because they are too like us. We mus
38
38
39
39
I propose a new category: Aliens as outside context entities. The alien as fundamental physiological, psychological, categorical and semantic break with our parochial assumptions of what alien life might look like.
40
40
41
-

41
+

42
42
43
43
### Xenobiological universalism
44
44
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Autocatalysts - molecules that can create _themselves_ without being used up - d
68
68
69
69
<aside>
70
70
71
-

71
+

72
72
73
73
Examples of xenoscientific fiction include:
74
74
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ When creating improbable biologies, there must be some hook our players can grab
110
110
111
111
<aside>
112
112
113
-
[](/products/context)
113
+
[](/products/context)
114
114
115
115
This article was research for [CONT/EXT](/products/context), my upcoming britpunk one-shot for Mothership. Please follow or [subscribe](/mailing-list/) for updates.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/blog/on-remembrance-of-the-daleks/on-remembrance-of-the-daleks.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ This was not your dad's _Doctor Who_.
30
30
31
31
It seems strange to think about late-80s _Doctor Who_ as cool. We're talking about a (by that time) obscure British science fiction series with a distinctly middle-class audience. (Look no further than Ace's _Blue Peter_ badges.) You have to understand, it was a less cynical time trying hard to be cynical. The endless cycle of gritty reboots had only just got started, and it seemed they'd never get stale. It felt like a fresh start for _Doctor Who_, but it turned out to spell its end.
32
32
33
-

33
+

34
34
35
35
### Hi Vis
36
36
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ I mean, even _Loki_ addressed this, and that's coming from within the confines o
68
68
69
69
You see, we’re always told interfering with history is dangerous… unless it’s the Doctor doing it. In which case, it’s just the sensible politics of time travel. Leave it to the grown-ups. Just as with the neoliberal consensus, better things are not possible. Interfering with the status-quo could only lead to worse outcomes, just as meddling with time by, say, killing Hitler inevitably paves the way for a hypothetical Super Hitler.
70
70
71
-

71
+

72
72
73
73
## Hand of Omega
74
74
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ It also shares a lot in common with the TARDIS. A semi-intelligent box that hide
82
82
83
83
I don’t think the Hand is ever referenced again in the _Doctor Who_ TV canon, which is a shame. A piece of grimdark worldbuilding erased by Russell T. Davies’ shiny, new “Whoniverse”. The Americans already have enough glossy sci-fi, why couldn't we draw from the rich tradition of distinctively grubby British dystopia, instead? And I can’t think of a better vehicle for that than _Doctor Who_. Certainly, the 7th Doctor was heading in that direction before it got cancelled.
84
84
85
-

85
+

86
86
87
87
## Special Weapons
88
88
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ You see, it hints at more: if there’s a special weapons Dalek what other speci
92
92
93
93
<aside>
94
94
95
-
[](/products/context)
95
+
[](/products/context)
96
96
97
97
This article was research for [CONT/EXT](/products/context), my upcoming britpunk one-shot for Mothership. Please follow or [subscribe](/mailing-list/) for updates.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/blog/shiftless-horror/shiftless-horror.md
+5-5Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ This post evolved out of a [self-essay](https://rolltodoubt.wordpress.com/2023/1
20
20
21
21
At the edges of [CONT/EXT](/products/context/) is the institution after which the module is named. What kind of organisation is CONT/EXT, and what is its place in a game like _Mothership_?
22
22
23
-

23
+

24
24
25
25
## Shiftless
26
26
27
27
In _Alien_ (1979) the protagonists are not scientists or explorers, they are workers on what is, effectively, a giant piece of industrial machinery, employed as precarious contractors, apathetic to the wonders of space, resentful and perhaps a little bit bored, and who only reluctantly respond to that fateful distress signal.
28
28
29
29
<aside>
30
30
31
-
")
31
+
")
32
32
33
33
In my mind the characters from _Alien_ seemed working class but, looking through the cast list, actually a lot of them are officers, of one form or another. Distinctly middle-class occupations.
34
34
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Elements of this "shiftless" or "grubby" science fiction include:
49
49
-**Exploitation.** Billionaires dream of reaching space: a limitless void free from physical restrictions and the social forces that bind the rich and protect the vulnerable. The shiftless always keep a cynical eye on such endeavours.
50
50
-**Institutional.** All of the above combine into shiftless sci-fi's most common motif: the oppressive institution.
51
51
52
-

52
+

53
53
54
54
## The Inevitable Horror of British Institutions
55
55
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ In many ways, these institutions mirror the forces of the universe itself. Their
77
77
78
78
And CONT/EXT is part of that horror: it's inhuman ruthlessness. The existential threats to humanity are terrifying, but so are the strategies for survival. Agents of CONT/EXT expose themselves to bizarre alien infections, sacrifice their lives, just to learn something, anything that might give humanity a slim chance to survive impending annihilation. For what? So they might be the last to die? So that their loved ones might have a chance aboard whatever fateful lifeboat CONT/EXT might scramble together?
79
79
80
-

80
+

81
81
82
82
### A survey of fictional British institutions
83
83
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ Perhaps this explains the preponderance of secret societies across the Atlantic:
131
131
132
132
<aside>
133
133
134
-
[](/products/context)
134
+
[](/products/context)
135
135
136
136
This article was research for [CONT/EXT](/products/context), my upcoming britpunk one-shot for Mothership. Please follow or [subscribe](/mailing-list/) for updates.

15
+

16
16
17
17
As part of my prep I've been using tables for all elements of my campaign: rumours, locations, NPCs, etc. Everything is tabulated so that it can be randomly selected at a moment's notice, during play or prep. It has a number of benefits. Firstly, it's an aid for improvisation and naturalism.
18
18
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Create the following tables:
65
65
66
66
You can roll as many as 30 times on the same spark table for this system, so tables may have to be large (perhaps three d20 table) to create unique outcomes for each player.
0 commit comments