Skip to content

DR: GHA centralization: Which workflows to include? #13

@t-will-gillis

Description

@t-will-gillis

Overview

We need to decide which GHA workflows we may want to include in the centralization project, both to plan the implementation and to determine which label keys need to be included.

Background

In the Monday devs meeting, 10/27/25, Bonnie, Will, and the team reviewed the current Website GitHub Actions workflows and decided which are candidates for making available to the rest of Hack for LA, each workflow's priority to the organization, and whether the workflow used labels designated as "Series":

Decision

The priorities are as follows:

  • MUST HAVE:
    • "Add Update Label Weekly" (aka "Schedule Friday 0700")
    • "Update Label Directory"
      • incl. "Flag Issues Unlabeled After Deletion"
    • "Issue Trigger"
      • NOTE: likely needs to be broken down further...
    • "Schedule Monthly" incl. "WR Schedule Monthly"
  • SHOULD HAVE:
    • NOTE: possibly could combine???
    • ("PR Verification"- see COULD HAVE)
    • "Pull Request Trigger" incl. "WR Pull Request Trigger"
    • "Set PR Labels" incl. "WR Set PR Labels"
    • "PR Instructions" incl. "WR PR Instructions"|
  • COULD HAVE:
    • "PR Verification" see above
    • "Member Activity Trigger"
    • "Move Closed Issues"
  • WON'T HAVE:
    • "Schedule Daily" (aka "Update GitHub")
    • "Update VRMS Data"
    • "Lint SCSS"
    • "CodeQL Actions"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

documentationImprovements or additions to documentationdraftissue is in draft mode

Type

No type

Projects

Status

In Progress

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions