Skip to content

there is no need for both peekCText and peekCAText to exist #80

@chessai

Description

@chessai

when i made my PR to change things from String to Text, i made an effort not to remove or add any functions, so as to minimise the chance of introducing a bug. however i noticed you had two variants of this peek function in use, but they both have the same type and implementation. One should be removed - i would prefer to remove 'peekCAText' and keep 'peekCText'.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions