Improve support for readOnlyRootFs #2003
TobiasDeBruijn
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
What’s the use case and benefits of this? Security? Against what? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Security yeah. It doesn't add a lot compared to e.g not running as root, but it does contribute slightly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey there,
I want to make all my pods have a readOnlyRootFs, this however proved difficult for Transmission, not impossible though. This is how I had to solve the couple of issues. This is specific to Kubernetes and PIA as provider:
I had to create a couple of
emptyDir
s, for/tmp
,/etc/openvpn/pia
and/etc/transmission
:Mounted at
/tmp
,/etc/openvpn/pia
and/etc/transmission
respectively:This too caused some issues, for
/etc/openvpn/pia
it was missing two scripts it needs and the configuration files. This was solved with the followinginitContainer
:For
/etc/transmission
it too was missing required scripts, this too was solved with aninitContainer
:With that, you have a working Transmission with
Possible, but difficult and verbose.
The 'Feature request' then here is, can we make this easier?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions