Use current matefacture core 8.0.0 release

[TobiasNx]

@Phu2 should I just replace the metafacture folder or does it make sense to provide a separate folder on the server with the metafacture release and not include metafacture core in this repo.

I would suggest not including is better.

[TobiasNx]

Context note:

Due to the missing SRU opener in 7.0.0 I added a locally build metafatcure distribution of the pre-release: https://github.com/hbz/lobid-extra-holdings/tree/main/metafacture-core?rgh-link-date=2026-03-11T08%3A40%3A04.000Z

Since the new release has the sru opener included we just could use the release and have it lying around on the server

[Phu2]

I would just update the metafacture folder in this repo.

[acka47]

"Matefacture", I like it. Prost!