You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After reading some of the proposed ideas on the limitations of the behavior of search, find and select, I think I have arrived at an idea that solves a couple of them.
Namely, a version of search (and rsearch) that:
works independently in each selection (like f and t)
respects mode (will extend in select mode like most motions)
reads the pattern directly from a given register without prompting the user
each cursor will search for a different pattern if there are multiple values in the register (same behavior as p)
I expect it would be mostly useful with macros, heavy multicursor workflows, and in sequenced keybinds.
Any thoughts?
If there is a better place to bring this up, please let me know.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
After reading some of the proposed ideas on the limitations of the behavior of search, find and select, I think I have arrived at an idea that solves a couple of them.
Namely, a version of search (and rsearch) that:
f
andt
)p
)I expect it would be mostly useful with macros, heavy multicursor workflows, and in sequenced keybinds.
Any thoughts?
If there is a better place to bring this up, please let me know.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions