Resource Submission: Plannotator

[backnotprop]

Display Name

Plannotator

Category

Hooks

Subcategory

General

Primary Link

https://github.com/backnotprop/plannotator

Secondary Link

https://plannotator.ai

Author Name

backnotprop

Author Link

https://github.com/backnotprop

License

BUSL-1.1

Other License

Business Source License 1.1

Description

Interactive plan review UI that intercepts ExitPlanMode via hooks, letting users visually annotate plans with comments, deletions, and replacements before approving or denying with detailed feedback.

Validation

Install via curl -fsSL https://plannotator.ai/install.sh | bash or as a Claude Code plugin with /plugin marketplace add backnotprop/plannotator.

Additional Comments

Also works with OpenCode. Features include URL sharing with compression, Obsidian/Bear integration, and configurable plan saving to custom paths.

Recommendation Checklist

• I have checked that a similar resource does not already exist in the list.
• I have verified that all provided links are functional and accessible.
• I genuinely believe this resource adds value to the Claude Code ecosystem.
• This submission covers only one resource (submit separate forms for multiple).
• I understand that resource submissions may be rejected, and I am fine with that.

EDIT

[hesreallyhim]

@backnotprop thanks this looks really cool... may I ask if Plannotator has a premium tier, or are you planning to introduce one in the near future? The answer is fine either way, I just want to know. Thanks, it's very well done.

EDIT: Spelling, grammar

[backnotprop]

Hey @hesreallyhim

Right now it's completely free. And i have some more cool features on the way that will all be open/free.

I'm just seeing where it goes with some ideas for premium but im not rushing too it. I am open to collab there.

Coding agents are moving so fast I wouldnt want to have anyone pay for anything that gets outdated overnight. Also I need Claude Code team to implement some hooks bug fixes to make it truly seamless.

[hesreallyhim]

@backnotprop ok got it, thanks. Also I don't see a formal privacy policy but based on the documents/website I take it is your position that no data whatsoever is sent to any server except anthropic(?) (well, at least not by your app)

I moved this to Alternative Clients (maybe needs a better name) because this feels more like a UI-facing thing to me, let me know if you disagree. (I know it's hooks-based but still.)

[backnotprop]

@hesreallyhim

I guess it's an alternative client for planning / plan mode. Based on the list you have, that seems fine.

I dont have privacy policy. I will add one to the marketing site. However, it runs completely locally. Like the hook opens up the web app (code is local) on a localhost URL. Users can share the plan if they want, and all that does is compress the plan into the URL (no backend storage) and I use a static site I host that - doesn't have any sort of logging at all. All the code's open source, so that's all can be validated.

But I'll attest formally here that no data is stored or logged on any external server if a user decides to share their plan.

[hesreallyhim]

thanks @backnotprop appreciate the formal clarification.

yeah i know what you mean, "alternative client" is not 100% apt either, but it seems to me that the differentiator is something UI-related, and hooks are more like an implementation detail. I'll defer to you if you feel strongly one way or the other - one consideration is also the hooks category is more "crowded" than the alt clients library.

So you encode the whole plan into the URL? Interesting, and you never run up against the browser's maximum length?

anyway i'm approving this, just going to space it out a little. i'm kind of pushing all these "Ralph" projects in at the moment because I think it's kind of fun and interesting. So, expect some time this week. Cheers!

[hesreallyhim]

/approve