[Resource]: claude-code-parallel

[k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x]

Display Name

claude-code-parallel

Category

Agent Skills

Sub-Category

General

Primary Link

https://github.com/k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x/claude-code-parallel

Author Name

k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x

Author Link

https://github.com/k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x

License

MIT

Other License

No response

Description

Workflow for parallel development with multiple Claude Code instances. Each worker gets an isolated branch with UUID identification, enabling concurrent development without conflicts and clean merges.

Validate Claims

Install the skill and start two Claude Code sessions on the same feature branch. Each will create its own isolated branch, work independently, and merge back without conflicts.

Specific Task(s)

Task(s)Run multiple Claude Code instances on the same feature without file conflicts.

Specific Prompt(s)

Work on feature/zk-auth using parallel workflow. Add the Poseidon hash constraints to the Groth16 circuit in /circuits/credential.circom

Additional Comments

No response

Recommendation Checklist

• I have checked that this resource hasn't already been submitted
• My resource provides genuine value to Claude Code users, and any risks are clearly stated
• All provided links are working and publicly accessible
• I am submitting only ONE resource in this issue
• I understand that low-quality or duplicate submissions may be rejected

[hesreallyhim]

thanks @k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x I appreciate you recommendations, although I would prefer to focus on one at a time at the moment - having two open reduces the likelihood of getting a review. also, can you confirm that the information on your profile is accurate and up to date? in particular regarding your company affiliation? thank you!

[k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x]

Hi @hesreallyhim! Thanks for checking. Yes, my profile information is accurate and up to date. I can confirm my company affiliation if needed just let me know what verification you'd prefer.

[hesreallyhim]

@k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x that's ok thanks - if you prefer to keep these both open can you at least tell me which one i should prioritize?

[k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x]

Hi! That's ok, thanks for the flexibility. If we're keeping both open, I'd suggest prioritizing claude-code-parallel it's further along and more focused in scope.

[hesreallyhim]

@k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x ok gotcha - was this auto-generated? that's not in itself a blocker, it could mean that your builder plugin is very very good, but I'd like to know. Also it doesn't seem to me that this has anything to do with Ralph Wiggum. If you chose that because you didn't see other relevant sub-categories, you should put "General" /request-changes

[github-actions]

🔄 Changes Requested by @hesreallyhim

Please review the submission requirements.

Please edit your issue to address these points. The validation will run again automatically after you make changes.

[k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x]

@hesreallyhim partially auto-generated I used another plugin I created (claude-code-builder) to structure it properly.
The core instructions are my own work I've been using this workflow for a while to parallelize Claude Code instances. After reading that Boris Cherny uses a similar approach (see his thread), I decided to make it public.
So basically, the builder plugin just helps structure the skill correctly, but the actual logic and workflow are mine.
And yes, I'll switch the category to "General" thanks for pointing that out!

[github-actions]

🤖 Validation Results

✅ All validation checks passed!

Your submission is ready for review by a maintainer.

Validated Data:

{
  "display_name": "claude-code-parallel",
  "category": "Agent Skills",
  "subcategory": "General",
  "primary_link": "https://github.com/k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x/claude-code-parallel",
  "author_name": "k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x",
  "author_link": "https://github.com/k9zt4qv3p6r1m8x",
  "license": "MIT",
  "description": "Workflow for parallel development with multiple Claude Code instances. Each worker gets an isolated branch with UUID identification, enabling concurrent development without conflicts and clean merges.",
  "secondary_link": "",
  "last_modified": "2026-01-13:13-29-59",
  "active": "TRUE",
  "last_checked": "2026-01-14:20-47-43"
}

---

_{This comment is automatically updated when you edit the issue.}

[github-actions]

📝 Issue Updated

@hesreallyhim - The submitter has edited their issue in response to your requested changes.

✅ The updated submission now passes all validation checks!

You may want to review the changes and consider approving the submission.