HHH-19394 fix a test which made a VERY strange assumption

This test seems to have been written to assume that Hibernate has
to call getPersistProperty() during the flush cycle, but with it
was actually wrong thet Hibernate was previously doing this.

Author: gavinking

hibernate-core/src/test/java/org/hibernate/orm/test/bytecode/enhancement/access/HierarchyPropertyAccessTest.java

@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ public void testParent(SessionFactoryScope scope) {
 			assertThat( entity.getSuperProperty() ).isEqualTo( 8 );
 
 			entity.setProperty( "transient: updated" );
+			// I had to add this call because this test was
+			// assuming that Hibernate would call this getter
+			// during flush, but that is no longer true
+			entity.getPersistProperty();
 		} );
 
 		scope.inTransaction( session -> {
@@ -66,6 +70,10 @@ public void testChild(SessionFactoryScope scope) {
 			assertThat( entity.getSuperProperty() ).isEqualTo( 8 );
 
 			entity.setProperty( "transient: updated" );
+			// I had to add this call because this test was
+			// assuming that Hibernate would call this getter
+			// during flush, but that is no longer true
+			entity.getPersistProperty();
 		} );
 
 		scope.inTransaction( session -> {