fix assertion that I believe to be incorrect at least on Postgres

gavinking · gavinking · commit e0064279209f · 2024-12-23T19:42:31.000+01:00
I don't think that's how Postgres arrays actually work
diff --git a/documentation/src/main/asciidoc/introduction/Entities.adoc b/documentation/src/main/asciidoc/introduction/Entities.adoc
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ class Event {
 }
 ----
 
-The `@Array` annotation is optional, but it's important to limit the amount of storage space the database allocates to the `ARRAY` column.
+The `@Array` annotation is optional--it lets us specify an upper bound on the length of the `ARRAY` column.
 By writing `@Array(length=7)` here, we specified that DDL should be generated with the column type `TINYINT ARRAY[7]`.
 
 Just for fun, we used an enumerated type in the code above, but the array element time may be almost any <<basic-type-list,basic type>>.

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ class Event {`
`1521`	`1521`	`}`
`1522`	`1522`	`----`
`1523`	`1523`
`1524`		-The `@Array` annotation is optional, but it's important to limit the amount of storage space the database allocates to the `ARRAY` column.
	`1524`	+The `@Array` annotation is optional--it lets us specify an upper bound on the length of the `ARRAY` column.
`1525`	`1525`	By writing `@Array(length=7)` here, we specified that DDL should be generated with the column type `TINYINT ARRAY[7]`.
`1526`	`1526`
`1527`	`1527`	`Just for fun, we used an enumerated type in the code above, but the array element time may be almost any <<basic-type-list,basic type>>.`