You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here, we fit the two part model using MaAsLin2 and LOCOM( A logistic regression model for testing differential abundance in compositional microbiome data). First, we fit the models separately and then combine the two-part model using the p-value combination method CCT.
76
+
Here, we fit the two part model using MaAsLin2 and LOCOM( A logistic regression model for testing differential abundance in compositional microbiome data). First, we fit the models separately and then combine the two-part model using p-value combination methods.
77
77
78
78
### Run MaAsLin2
79
79
```{r}
@@ -172,29 +172,40 @@ paras_LO = paras_LO %>%
172
172
dflist = list(paras_LO, paras_CR)
173
173
```
174
174
175
-
After running MaAsLin2 and LOCOM, we use Vanilla, Cauchy Combination Test (CCT) and stouffer to combine p-values and calculate q-values based on combined p-values. We can use the DAssemble() from library(DAssemble).
175
+
After running MaAsLin2 and LOCOM, we use Vanilla, Cauchy Combination Test (CCT) and stouffer to combine p-values and calculate q-values based on combined p-values. We can use the DAssemble() from library(DAssemble) for this step.
To compare LOCOM and MaAsLin2 using different combination methods, we create plots to display the top 10 genes identified based on their q-values. The left panel compares the -log10(p-values) obtained from each method, with higher values indicating greater
208
+
statistical significance and providing a clearer interpretation of significance levels across genes. The right panel presents the estimated coefficients (effect sizes) from each method for the samegenes, with plus (+) and minus (-) symbols indicating positive and negative associations, respectively.
0 commit comments